Page 1 of 2
Inflight refueling
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:29 pm
by Dannyp19
OK. Now that it seems the refueling doctrine is working properly (thanks guys) What is the best way to manage refueling? Im still losing tankers and aircraft when refueling. Its obvious the AI doesn't manage the process. Is there a simple way or do I need to do a spreadsheet?
How many aircraft can a tanker refuel?
At what point do you need to send tanker RTB?
Lets say I have 8 strike aircraft, they will need a fill-up to reach the strike point and a fill-up to get home. What is the best way to do this.
RE: Inflight refueling
Posted: Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:45 pm
by mikmykWS
Danny if you can post some save games we can determine what exactly is going wrong.
In general I set up a couple of tanker orbits using support missions. How are you doing it?
Mike
RE: Inflight refueling
Posted: Fri Dec 06, 2013 7:28 am
by smudge56
I use the 1/3 rule is that ok?
RE: Inflight refueling
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 4:29 am
by Dannyp19
I use support missions also. I feel like Im mismanaging it. I dont think its a bug.
When does an aircraft decide to refuel? At bingo relative to tanker position or home base?
RE: Inflight refueling
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 5:55 am
by Dimitris
If a tanker is airborne, aircraft that can refuel from it (and have their doctrine option "use refuel" set to YES) will base their bingo calculations on it and not their home base.
RE: Inflight refueling
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 8:04 am
by Dobey455
ORIGINAL: Sunburn
If a tanker is airborne, aircraft that can refuel from it (and have their doctrine option "use refuel" set to YES) will base their bingo calculations on it and not their home base.
Thanks for that info.
How are multiple tankers handled?
If I have a large number of planes needing to refuel and multiple tankers on a refueling mission will the aircraft needing fuel take it from all of the tankers equally, or will they suck one dry then move onto the next one?
Im asking this mainly thinking of the sammler tankers such as the S-3 viking or Buddy tankers which barely have enough fuel as an individual tanker to fully fuel more than one fighter so would need to be used in groups.
RE: Inflight refueling
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 8:48 am
by Dimitris
They load-balance them if possible. (Which is why you sometimes see thirsty aircraft go to a tanker farther out when another one is nearby). If you've seen some "Why aren't my planes just refuelling from the nearest tanker?" questions posted here, this is why.
RE: Inflight refueling
Posted: Sat Dec 07, 2013 8:32 pm
by Dannyp19
ORIGINAL: Sunburn
If a tanker is airborne, aircraft that can refuel from it (and have their doctrine option "use refuel" set to YES) will base their bingo calculations on it and not their home base.
Airborne period? What if tanker is RTB?
Airborne refueling has a lot of pesky details to take into account. Almost like trying to do an STOT.
I read an article that was describing the difficulty in tanker assets during Operation Enduring Freedom. Its a delicate balance that I dont think Command is taking into account AI wise. (Just my opinion there, y'all are doing a great job with this game)
My wife has a "girls night out" tonight. So I'll be able to get a lot of time tonight to work this out and test a few refueling operations.
RE: Inflight refueling
Posted: Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:34 am
by Dimitris
Tankers on RTB are not taken into account when doing the bingo calcs.
Tanker management in RL is a full-time job on its own. Most air arms handle it very conservatively and simply throw more tankers on the job than what the nominal calcs say they will need, simply because so many things can go wrong. (And even then, not a few aircraft do land on divert airfields or ditch). Allocating "just enough" tankers on an op is generally an invitation to trouble - both in RL and in Command [:)]
RE: Inflight refueling
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 10:10 pm
by mikeCK
How do I force a plane to refuel using a nearby tanker instead of returning to the carrier? I tried issuing the command "refuel" and it's mission changed to "maneuvering to refuel" and it's doctrine is set to "air refuel":yes
Yet the plane just flew right by the tanker on its way to the carrier. I needed them to stay airborne!
RE: Inflight refueling
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 7:24 pm
by mikeCK
I'm going to bump (necro) this thread because I still don't know how to do this: see above if you can help
RE: Inflight refueling
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 7:59 pm
by Mini_Von
I had a similar problem.
I can't post links yet, so here is the end of the link.
forums/tm.asp?m=3563439
My post is titled "[B490] Air Refueling Problem" in the Tech Forum.
RE: Inflight refueling
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 10:10 pm
by mikmykWS
ORIGINAL: mikeCK
How do I force a plane to refuel using a nearby tanker instead of returning to the carrier? I tried issuing the command "refuel" and it's mission changed to "maneuvering to refuel" and it's doctrine is set to "air refuel":yes
Yet the plane just flew right by the tanker on its way to the carrier. I needed them to stay airborne!
Hi Mike
If you right click the unit there is a refuel if possible option you can select.
In this case though wondering if you had the right tanker refueling like mix. Remember what the tanker and target aircraft were?
Mike
RE: Inflight refueling
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 11:17 pm
by mikeCK
Yes, I was trying to refuel F-14's and F-18s from a KA-6b code "CHEVRON"
I have "use refuel" (or whatever it is) set to "yes" in the doctrine but my planes flew right past the tanker and on back home. I had hit "refuel (if possible)....
RE: Inflight refueling
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:45 am
by ComDev
Hm think we also need to add Tanker planning to the strike mission editor... although that will take some time to do hehe.
I'm quite baffled by the fact that the more stuff we add to the sim, the more real-life issues we run into.
To speed things up free to submitt pseudo code, design documentation, technical/operational documentation on tanker ops, etc [8D]
Thanks! [8D]
RE: Inflight refueling
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 10:50 am
by Dannyp19
Hey Emsoy!
Found this
http://www.military-airplanner.com/
Dont know if this is available for civilian use or not. Looked interesting though.[:)]
RE: Inflight refueling
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 11:09 am
by guanotwozero
ORIGINAL: emsoy
Hm think we also need to add Tanker planning to the strike mission editor... although that will take some time to do hehe.
I'm quite baffled by the fact that the more stuff we add to the sim, the more real-life issues we run into.
To speed things up free to submitt pseudo code, design documentation, technical/operational documentation on tanker ops, etc [8D]
Thanks! [8D]
Ah, it's the fractal zoom effect - the more detail you cover, the more uncovered detail you can see. Common problem with software, especially for something that aspires to as much realism as possible. It just means you have to draw limits somewhere.
Happy to contribute ideas from concepts to algorithms, tanker ops or anything else, though we'll probably need a bit of guidance from you and the rest of the dev team to help steer progress in the right direction.
First thing I'd suggest is to create a new forum section for this (Dev Ideas or something), as there will likely be many threads involved.
RE: Inflight refueling
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:48 pm
by mikeCK
Maybe an option when you right click on a plane (group) that says "use nearest airborne refueler"
couldn't you just double check to see if "refuel if possible" forces the plane to refuel at the closest refueling point whether that's a carrier or an airborne refueling? usually will be the former.
RE: Inflight refueling
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 7:40 pm
by NickD
Out of interest, has anyone attempted to replicate the epic tanker operations which the RAF used during the Operation Black Buck Vulcan bomber raids on the Falklands? That would be a test for the game's in flight refuelling functionality! (even the veteran RAF tanker staff had trouble working out how to pull this off).
RE: Inflight refueling
Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 8:19 pm
by Maromak
Flankerk has a Black Buck scenario on the way.