Page 1 of 1
Why LSA is the best CC?
Posted: Sat Jul 05, 2014 11:48 pm
by Tejszd
Why LSA is the best CC?
You can have troops from 2 BG's attacking from two different entry VL's onto a map!!!
Don't understand why it was removed in PiTF and later releases (GTC)....

RE: Why LSA is the best CC?
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2014 12:09 am
by newts2339
Good question Tejszd. Why won't they answer. It has been brought up before a number of times.
RE: Why LSA is the best CC?
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2014 12:47 pm
by SteveMcClaire
It has been answered a number of times before. Please see the PitF forum where that game is discussed.
Thanks,
Steve
RE: Why LSA is the best CC?
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2014 12:12 am
by Tejszd
Instead of making clearer directions in the manual or just finding a way to make it simpler in game the feature was dropped/removed if I'm reading correctly???
RE: Why LSA is the best CC?
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:40 am
by SteveMcClaire
Borrowing forces from the second battle group was removed because it caused the UI to be complex and difficult to understand and because the actual benefit was small. The question of where the enemy forces are going to come from is still present in the game, since the defender does not know which enemy BG was the front line BG.
Steve
RE: Why LSA is the best CC?
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2014 6:37 am
by STIENER
just saw this post......i have to agree with Tejszd.
IMO >
"Borrowing forces from the second battle group was removed because it caused the UI to be complex and difficult to understand and because the actual benefit was small. "
hmmmmmm....everyone i play LSA with dont seem to have any problem with the UI. its not complex IMO. the benefits of borrowing forces is not small IMO...you get free rested squads or support for as long as you want and it fills a short slotted BG's roster, also you initially get to enter from 2 diff VL's. these are not small benefits.
i never read any posts that said players didnt like this option? too bad it was dropped. a step backwards IMO.