AFV reliability ratings
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2014 10:28 am
Not sure if this is the appropriate place, as this is not a typical bug, but it is at least an inconsistency with the manual. In WITW the reliability ratings are reversed from both the manual and WITE;
for example, according to the Commander Report the StugIII is a 25 in WITE but a 58 in the West; while the King Tiger in WITE is a 40 whilst its WITW version rates at 28, theoretically making it more reliable than the assault gun.
I checked the Sherman tank (reliability is considered its best feature by some authorities)and the various versions in WITW are ranked in the 70s. A look at the PDF manual doesn't show any significant change from the WITE version of the rules. An oversight? Or am I missing something glaringly obvious?
Otherwise, except for an occasional difficulty loading a saved game (seems to be self-correcting), another great product.
for example, according to the Commander Report the StugIII is a 25 in WITE but a 58 in the West; while the King Tiger in WITE is a 40 whilst its WITW version rates at 28, theoretically making it more reliable than the assault gun.
I checked the Sherman tank (reliability is considered its best feature by some authorities)and the various versions in WITW are ranked in the 70s. A look at the PDF manual doesn't show any significant change from the WITE version of the rules. An oversight? Or am I missing something glaringly obvious?
Otherwise, except for an occasional difficulty loading a saved game (seems to be self-correcting), another great product.