Page 1 of 1
OT: Shinano takes 16 inches
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 1:56 pm
by BattleMoose
http://img-9gag-fun.9cache.com/photo/abbdd6L_700b.jpg
This belongs here. No idea if its real but its on the internet, so...
RE: OT: Shinano takes 16 inches
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2015 3:18 pm
by Amoral
A ballistics test of a 16" projectile fired against a section of armoured plating intended for Shinano took place at Dahlgren, VA in 1946.
http://navweaps.com/index_tech/tech-040.htm
RE: OT: Shinano takes 16 inches
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2015 2:11 am
by crsutton
That chunk of metal is at the Washington Navy Yard. Cool place to visit.
RE: OT: Shinano takes 16 inches
Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:31 pm
by zuluhour
you really should change the topic name, somewhere there is someone named Shinano.
Back to the subject, I saw a photo somewhere of a 16" shell fired from the Mass off Africa
at the French. It did not explode and came to rest a "few decks" down. It was a big chunk
of metal. Not sure I would have wanted to be the ordinance guy on that one.
RE: OT: Shinano takes 16 inches
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2015 5:05 pm
by rustysi
ordinance
Is that city code 1452.123?[:D]
RE: OT: Shinano takes 16 inches
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2015 6:11 pm
by zuluhour
same thing, only different.[;)]
RE: OT: Shinano takes 16 inches
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2015 9:27 pm
by JohnDillworth
"Therefore, these plates are the only warship armor plates that could not be completely penetrated by ANY gun ever put on a warship when installed leaning back at 45°, as they were in the actual turrets!!! "according to the link above the penetration occurred with an of "OBLIQUITY: Near-normal (0°)" .so I think that means no angle which would be pretty close. A shell fired at a distance probably would hit at an angle and would not have penetrated. The report is a bit confusing but it appears that the armor was pretty darn good