Page 1 of 2
Pelton (GHC) vs Mr Floppy(WA) GHC Victory
Posted: Sun Nov 08, 2015 12:20 am
by Peltonx
WA’s invaded turn 10 and are just getting to Gustov Line, while bombing rail yards and ports.
Over Germany bombing of Ruhr and sub locations.

RE: Pelton (GHC) vs Mr Floppy(WA)
Posted: Thu Nov 26, 2015 11:23 am
by Peltonx
WA’s invade Northern Italy, thankfully 4 Panzer Divisions and 4 Infantry Divisions were close by waiting on just such an invasion. The LW also was close by with 1000’s of rested LB and TACB’s as can be seen by the high interdiction at sea. Next turn all the planes will be active.

RE: Pelton (GHC) vs Mr Floppy(WA)
Posted: Thu Nov 26, 2015 11:24 am
by Peltonx
The Gustov Line is solid also.
1st Army still has 3 Panzer Divisions in Reserve.

RE: Pelton (GHC) vs Mr Floppy(WA)
Posted: Thu Nov 26, 2015 7:30 pm
by Seminole
WA’s invade Northern Italy, thankfully
A Thanksgiving gift, to be sure. Not only has he ensured the N Italy garrison is free to respond, only one more garrison zone invasion will release all your obligations.
Has he pushed your southern line to this point, or just picketed it?
Congrats on winning the airwar at this point over the landing zone. How are the troop/cargo ship losses looking so far?
RE: Pelton (GHC) vs Mr Floppy(WA)
Posted: Thu Nov 26, 2015 9:32 pm
by KWG
Looks like the Allies are going for the rails/railyards. Drive on Florence.
If successful it can leave the Germans with 1 main rail line bottleneck to south.
RE: Pelton (GHC) vs Mr Floppy(WA)
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2015 1:29 pm
by carlkay58
The flip side of the garrison coin is that the Allies will no longer be subject to losing VPs each turn for Axis garrison levels either. Sometimes that is more important to the Allie than you may think.
RE: Pelton (GHC) vs Mr Floppy(WA)
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2015 4:05 pm
by Peltonx
ORIGINAL: Seminole
WA’s invade Northern Italy, thankfully
A Thanksgiving gift, to be sure. Not only has he ensured the N Italy garrison is free to respond, only one more garrison zone invasion will release all your obligations.
Has he pushed your southern line to this point, or just picketed it?
Congrats on winning the airwar at this point over the landing zone. How are the troop/cargo ship losses looking so far?
He tried attacking it but only gained 1 hex, so hes tring another sspot
RE: Pelton (GHC) vs Mr Floppy(WA)
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 10:10 am
by Peltonx
More units arrive to seal the beachhead.
I expect more invasions to follow this one soon as WA appear to be using the invasion spam tactic.

RE: Pelton (GHC) vs Mr Floppy(WA)
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 10:11 am
by Peltonx
Gustov Line holds.

RE: Pelton (GHC) vs Mr Floppy(WA)
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 12:04 pm
by Seminole
I expect more invasions to follow this one soon as WA appear to be using the invasion spam tactic.
To the degree that S2Tanker tried it against you and in his game against me it seemed counterproductive. I really wore down his shipping with his inability to protect long routes, and the splitting of enemy forces makes them easier to deal with piecemeal because you have interior lines. But we handle invasions that come ashore in a different manner.
Do you have a pic of Allied shipping losses thus far in this game? From some stuff you had written earlier I presumed you were tracking it as well.
RE: Pelton (GHC) vs Mr Floppy(WA) T-38
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 10:01 am
by Peltonx
Turn 32
Axis Loses: 177,000
WA Loses: 149,000
Turn 38
Axis Loses: 191,000 Loses for last 5 turns: 14,000
WA Loses: 184,000 Loses for last 5 turns: 35,000
Ratio for last 5 turns: 2.5 to 1
Clearly KWG is doing much better using his air power to inflict massive loses week after week.
Slightly better than historical ratio to date. Extra loses being from transport loses to North Italy invasion area. So far both the Gustov Line and N. Italy beach head are holding.

Tactical bombing
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 10:01 am
by Peltonx
GL

RE: Tactical bombing
Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2015 10:23 pm
by Peltonx
Turn 41 VP’s this turn: -1 Total: -78 Manpower: 114,000 Arm Pts: 2,276,000
Looks like Mr Floppy has started copying KWG’s exploit. Almost all bombing is done tacticly, only 3 VP sights were lightly bombed and for the last 2 turns he has been tring to get a snake going. The northern beachhead is stuck, as infantry divisions arrive panzers are sent to France.
Mr Floppy is being alittle smarter then KWG hitting some VP sights keeping VP's lower.
Mr Floppys only mistake was the useless 2nd invasion that cost him allot of Vp's

RE: Tactical bombing
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2016 7:06 am
by loki100
ORIGINAL: Pelton
Looks like Mr Floppy has started copying KWG’s exploit. Almost all bombing is done tacticly, only 3 VP sights were lightly bombed and for the last 2 turns he has been tring to get a snake going. The northern beachhead is stuck, as infantry divisions arrive panzers are sent to France.
Pelton
I realise you only want comments that basically agree with your assertions fron now on.
Even so, its worth thinking that since you basically play the game the same way its not surprising that
your opponents gravitate to a set response. This has been the issue ever since you decided that kwg's approach was an exploit - in reality it would not work against a German player who played differently to your chosen approach.
RE: Tactical bombing
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2016 9:53 am
by HMSWarspite
+1
RE: Tactical bombing
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2016 11:19 am
by KWG
Mr Floppy is being alittle smarter then KWG hitting some VP sights keeping VP's lower.
Maybe......wiser maybe not...
-1, -10, -100, it doesnt matter how many Strategic Bombing VPs are lost - if you are not doing enough combined with a ground campaign to cause a breakout. However He may not really care about the VPs and is just fighting the war as he wants to.
OOPPS! I forgot ...
YES, yes you are absolutely correct®
Breakout
Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2016 11:03 am
by Peltonx
Mr Floppy breaks out from Brittany, nice offensive really.

RE: Breakout
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 12:23 am
by Peltonx
Looking to hold Paris until Jan 45

RE: Breakout
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 7:42 am
by LiquidSky
I cant figure out why people don't want to invade southern France. It was why the Germans evacuated France in the first place. The area is usually lightly defended, so you can get ashore easily...drop an army HQ, fill it with Multi-Role units then pop them out to explode into the empty southern interior.
The Germans cant afford to make a line, and you will seriously outnumber him in units with all your armour brigades, and (motorized) infantry brigades. Sooner or later they will be forced to pull back to the WestWall freeing up your D-Day units to chase him.
RE: Breakout
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 4:58 pm
by Peltonx
Good points.