Page 1 of 2

New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Sat May 21, 2016 8:32 pm
by Andy Mac
I have been working on a May 43 Start Scenario attached is current version - its far from perfect I am aware of that and the AI is really just the campaign AI truncated at this point.

All comments welcome really focussing on data issues for now before I start on the Ai

Andy

UPDATED to V5

RE: New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Sat May 21, 2016 9:14 pm
by PaxMondo
Wow ... you have been busy!!!

RE: New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Sat May 21, 2016 9:35 pm
by GetAssista
Woot!!

What I've noticed for Japan:
1. I suppose grossly inflated armaments, vehicles, merch and nav pools are for testing purposes only?
2. Some more fortifications on the Japan perimeter maybe? Marshalls/Gilberts/Solomons/NG look grossly neglected by Jap command for all the 1942 and easy prey for invasions
3. Do you plan doing something with China? Like shift Chinese LCUs to north-western part with hard terrain
4. Miri oil is not repaired, nor is Palembang
5. Many bases are below garrison requirements - quite a starting hassle for JFB

Are you striving for historical disposition? If yes then many important ships were at different locations at May 1, 1943. And some (Haruna) were alive ;) I can compile the list from combinedfleet.com TROMs and PM you if needed.

Thanks for your work!

RE: New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 10:25 am
by Andy Mac
1. Yes
2. I can add a little but the fact is historically the Japanese were nothing like as organised in defence as a human player of the game would be they had a very crustal defence in NG that was mostly bypassed its difficult because no player would allow themselves to be in that bad a position because they know the capabilities of the allies....
3. yes
4. Ok will fix
5. on the list !!

ta

RE: New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 10:52 am
by Andy Mac
Fixed Tarawa to historic garrison

RE: New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 10:54 am
by Andy Mac
3. China is difficult basically nothing much happened and Chinese did not do what a player would and withdraw so its weird

RE: New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 10:58 am
by Andy Mac
The biggest challenge and the weirdest thing for us as players is its not how any game we have seen would have went the starting point will NOT have doen some of the basics that any human player would have doen

RE: New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 12:19 pm
by Andy Mac
Being honest I don't see many folks playing this one in either PBEM or AI as the Japanese position will be so weak compared to a normal campaign mid 43 is simply too late to be fun for a Japanese player without having built the war machine but hey ho I wil finish it anywaty

RE: New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 12:21 pm
by Andy Mac
v3 posted

RE: New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 12:52 pm
by GetAssista
ORIGINAL: Andy Mac
The biggest challenge and the weirdest thing for us as players is its not how any game we have seen would have went the starting point will NOT have doen some of the basics that any human player would have doen
Yes, Japan R&D and airframe production in May 43 might make JFB go sit in the corner and cry quietly ) But we still play Downfall now and then.

Ok, here are the historical big ships' locations on May 1, 1943, that differ from the scenario:
Shokaku/Suzuya/Kumano/Tatsuta at Kure
Yamato/Junyo/Hiyo/Tone/Chikuma/Atago/Chokai/Agano/Jintsu/Naka/Nagara/ at Truk
Musashi/Haruna/Takao should be online and at Truk
Ise/Chitose are undergoing conversion at Kure
Hyuga at Sasebo (conversion started May 1st 1943 in RL)
Mogami/Ashigara/Sendai at Sasebo
Nachi/Isuzu at Yokosuka
Aoba at Truk, seriously damaged
Yubari at Rabaul
Abukuma at Maizuru, fitted with radar
Kiso enroute from Maizuru to Paramushiro with DDs Hatsushimo/Wakaba
Kinu/Kuma/ at Singapore
Kitakami/Oi at Soerabaya

RE: New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Sun May 22, 2016 1:09 pm
by Andy Mac
Thanks guys

RE: New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Mon May 23, 2016 12:24 pm
by Andy Mac
Working on the AI now while I wait for feedback mostly the allied AI as I am assuming most people would wnat to play Japan ??

RE: New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Tue May 24, 2016 12:00 am
by PaxMondo
ORIGINAL: Andy Mac

Being honest I don't see many folks playing this one in either PBEM or AI as the Japanese position will be so weak compared to a normal campaign mid 43 is simply too late to be fun for a Japanese player without having built the war machine but hey ho I wil finish it anywaty
Given this, they would have LARGE stockpile of supply AND HI ....

so the challenge for the IJ player would be a turn around ... can you do it in time ....

RE: New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Tue May 24, 2016 9:42 am
by Andy Mac
It is just weird Allied LBA NG in 43 and holding PM, no expansio attacks, lots of sunk carriers et etc


Very strange start compared to most PBEM's

RE: New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Tue May 24, 2016 9:44 am
by Andy Mac
Also ps locations are estimates I 'think' most of the main combat formations are in the right theatre but may be wrong

RE: New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Tue May 24, 2016 11:29 am
by PaxMondo
understood ...

RE: New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Tue May 24, 2016 3:47 pm
by Admiral DadMan
LCU 5556 4th Mar DefBtn is trying to move to Ndeni from Pearl Harbor. You could actually move this unit to Efate (1298) where it was in May 43

RE: New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Wed May 25, 2016 3:51 pm
by Andy Mac
Done

RE: New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Sun May 29, 2016 2:14 pm
by Andy Mac
Updated AI and improved starting locations posted

RE: New Scen May 43 Start

Posted: Sat Jun 04, 2016 3:31 pm
by Admiral DadMan
#426 F4F-7 should be carrier capable, pool 100