The assasination of Yamamoto and the course of war
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2003 12:12 am
A couple of days ago I saw a documentary on the History Channel about the death of Admiral Yamamoto.
It said that USN ambushed Yamamoto's Betty with P-38s and shot it down. So, actually USN assasinated him. Yamamoto died with age of 59 on April 18, 1943 on the sky of Buganville.
He lived 3 years more than his name. (His given name means 56. Wierd name.) Anyway, if he had survived the ambush and continued to command IJN, would the course of war have been different?
Was he really worth of risk and efforts taken by USN to assasinate him? They knew that by ambushing and killing Yamamoto, they might reveal that they had broken the code of IJN. What do you think?
It said that USN ambushed Yamamoto's Betty with P-38s and shot it down. So, actually USN assasinated him. Yamamoto died with age of 59 on April 18, 1943 on the sky of Buganville.
He lived 3 years more than his name. (His given name means 56. Wierd name.) Anyway, if he had survived the ambush and continued to command IJN, would the course of war have been different?
Was he really worth of risk and efforts taken by USN to assasinate him? They knew that by ambushing and killing Yamamoto, they might reveal that they had broken the code of IJN. What do you think?