Page 1 of 2
Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2016 11:34 pm
by DTomato
RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 12:57 am
by operating
That's one battle that I'd like to replay, but finding a game that would be relatively easy to manage and get into has alluded me. Seen a couple of older titles for this battle, but a bit leery of using them on a newer machine. A what if: If Manstein did what he wanted to do and ignored Hitler's recommendations..
RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 10:25 am
by wings7
It was a turning point for the Soviets and the beginning of the end for the Germans on the Eastern Front...hardly over-hyped! [8|]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Kursk
RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 12:05 pm
by Poopyhead
The Russians had a spy stationed in Japan, code-named Lucy, that gave them almost all of the intel on the attack. Stalin knew what was coming and prepared for it. The attack never had a chance. Guderian told Hitler, "The world doesn't care if you take Kursk."
As for the Tigers that Caidin mentioned in his book (the one in the pic), these weren't really the Panzerkampfwagen VI Tiger that is famous. The designer of this tank destroyer lost out to the Tiger Hitler chose. But he had 96 chassis built before the competing design won. So he mounted the 88 on it with no turret or machine guns and rushed them off to the battle. These actually did fairly well and destroyed 500 Russian tanks for the loss of a couple dozen. After the battle, the chassis were then rebuilt with a hull machine gun and became known as the Elefant.
RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 1:05 pm
by EwaldvonKleist
The single turning point on the eastern front was the failed operation Barbarossa (neither Leningrad, Voronesh, Moscow nor Rostov taken).
1943 Kursk offensive was meaningless long term. Even when we assume a german major victory, so what? 2 month later the soviets have replaced everything and the steamroller is back.
Barbarossa late 1941 was the single turning point, not Stalingrad or Kursk. In 1943 there was no possibility to force USSR to surrender.
Similar to the people who claim El Alamein 1942 to be decisive. Sure, because germany could have supplied a big offensive towards suez in 1943 after a successful El Alamein...
RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 1:08 pm
by wings7
ORIGINAL: Poopyhead
The Russians had a spy stationed in Japan, code-named Lucy, that gave them almost all of the intel on the attack. Stalin knew what was coming and prepared for it. The attack never had a chance. Guderian told Hitler, "The world doesn't care if you take Kursk."
More info on Lucy spy ring...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy_spy_ring
RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 1:12 pm
by EwaldvonKleist
Here is the Link to the Android Kursk Game from Joni Nuutinen, if you are interesteded in mobile games too.
No Gary Grigsby like simulation but entertaining game:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/deta ... kursk_demo
Btw: The tank Popyhead refers too (Ferdinand/Elefant) was designed by Ferdinand Porsche, the excellent engineer who developed the famous Porsche cars after WW2.
RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 1:56 pm
by E
Grigsby already covered Kursk...

RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 2:18 pm
by Gilmer
Definitely some interesting information provided here, in the story and in our own forum comments. I'm pretty interested since I'm playing War in the East right now as the Soviets and it is the middle of summer 1942.
RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 2:42 pm
by MrsWargamer
Kursk was big big big and guys always love big tanks in big battles to a point.
There have been other big battles with a lot of armour, but usually something makes the battle not make the cut. The last offensives between Russia and Japan seem under mentioned.
Some of the desert battles were big, but the armour wasn't the sexy late war armour.
RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 2:55 pm
by operating
ORIGINAL: E
Grigsby already covered Kursk...
Yeah, A "1984" release....![:(]
RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 4:34 pm
by Mobius
So far I have both the Prokhorovka book

and Ponyrii book
Highwater marks of the southern and northern pincers.
The time right before Stalingrad was probably the last chance the Germans had on winning the war. But moving panzer divisions around like chess pieces and getting mired down was a loser.
RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 4:35 pm
by Ostwindflak
What I always found more interesting than the battle at Kursk was the tank battle that raged at Prokhorovka 87 kilometers away from Kursk.
RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 6:13 pm
by MrsWargamer
I have a modest sized board game of the Prochorovka battle actually. I've had it since the 80s so it likely has some bias in the details.
RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 6:13 pm
by wings7
ORIGINAL: Ostwindflak
What I always found more interesting than the battle at Kursk was the tank battle that raged at Prokhorovka 87 kilometers away from Kursk.
Yes indeed...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Prokhorovka
RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:19 pm
by Rosseau
I've always wondered if that idiot Hitler cancelled Kursk. But it would have probably just extended the bloodshed another year, if that.
RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:38 pm
by wings7
ORIGINAL: MrsWargamer
I have a modest sized board game of the Prochorovka battle actually. I've had it since the 80s so it likely has some bias in the details.
Nice, do you have any photos...box, counters, etc.?
RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 2:16 am
by IntrepidMan
I've always wondered if that idiot Hitler cancelled Kursk. But it would have probably just extended the bloodshed another year, if that.
Hitler was on meth the last 8 years of his life so he wasnt very rational. Withdrawing the 2nd SS Panzer Korps at the height of the battle to the outrage of Manstein was instrumental in their defeat. Guderians plan to play defense throughout '43 might have extended the war by 2-3 years.
RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 8:47 am
by MrsWargamer
ORIGINAL: wings7
ORIGINAL: MrsWargamer
I have a modest sized board game of the Prochorovka battle actually. I've had it since the 80s so it likely has some bias in the details.
Nice, do you have any photos...box, counters, etc.?
That can be arranged.
RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:26 am
by Saint Ruth
Interesting read (especially those tank loss statistics), but I'm not sure about this:
"Germany had a choice: wait to be hammered by another offensive from the Russian steamroller, or take the initiative by launching its own offensive."
There was a third choice (Manstein's preferred option) which was to remove the bulge in the front by withdrawing German units from the North and South of the bulge to straighten the front, and then let the Russians attack and try and recreate his "backhand blow" of the Third Battle of Kharkov on a grand scale (i.e. withdraw in the face of the Russian attack and then counterattack and encircle the attackers).
I'm not sure it's "overhyped" either. It was the last opportunity the Germans had to gain the initiative on the Eastern Front.