Page 1 of 2
OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2017 8:01 am
by adarbrauner
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Take_Ichi ... te_note-27
"the escort force was the newly established 6th Escort Convoy Command and included Kajioka's flagship, the coal burning minelayer Shirataka, as well as destroyers Asakaze, Shiratsuyu and Fujinami, frigate Kurahashi, ocean escort ships ('kaibokan') CD-20 and CD-22, minesweeper W-2, subchasers CH-37 and CH-38 and gunboats Uji, Ataka and Tama Maru No. 7.[17]"
"Japanese naval staff officers gathered in Manila in June to analyze the Take Ichi convoy. The officers believed that Japan's communication codes were secure and discussed alternative explanations for the convoy's detection. These explanations included the increase in radio signals at the time the convoy sailed being detected by Allied radio traffic analysts, a Japanese officer in Manila accidentally divulging information and Allied spies working on the Manila waterfront radioing messages about the convoy's composition and departure. The meeting concluded that Allied spies were responsible for the convoy's detection, and the Japanese military's codes were not changed.[27]"
Good bibliography as well.
RE: OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2017 12:46 pm
by Revthought
ORIGINAL: adarbrauner
What was it with both Germany and Imperial Japan that made them believe, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that their naval codes just
could not have been broken? I always found this historical artifact fascinating.
RE: OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2017 4:02 pm
by adarbrauner
The hand of G-d and the Divine Providence, only.
RE: OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2017 4:57 pm
by Leandros
Interesting story - with great repercussions! Tks for posting.
Fred
RE: OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2017 5:35 pm
by BBfanboy
ORIGINAL: Revthought
ORIGINAL: adarbrauner
What was it with both Germany and Imperial Japan that made them believe, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that their naval codes just
could not have been broken? I always found this historical artifact fascinating.
Since their own people could not break test samples of code, they assumed the enemy could not do so. A common human failing to think that no one is better than you ...
RE: OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2017 10:04 pm
by zuluhour
+1
RE: OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2017 10:40 pm
by NigelKentarus
Hubris
RE: OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 1:00 pm
by pontiouspilot
In addition, we all know that there were powerful incentives at work to discourage any creative thinking that might tend to show someone's boss was a f... up!! Look at the silly process and brainlessness that went into determining the US torpedoes were junk. Fixing something like this was much more difficult in the Axis political/economic system.
RE: OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2017 7:21 pm
by Leandros
ORIGINAL: pontiouspilot
In addition, we all know that there were powerful incentives at work to discourage any creative thinking that might tend to show someone's boss was a f... up!! Look at the silly process and brainlessness that went into determining the US torpedoes were junk. Fixing something like this was much more difficult in the Axis political/economic system.
Since you mention torpedo problems, I believe a couple of high-ranking German officers connected
with the torpedo production were actually court-martialed after the German submarines had
experienced their share during the Norwegian campaign in 1940. Not that it did much to remedy
the problem but there was a distinct response.
Fred
RE: OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 1:17 pm
by Scholomancer
I know the British attempted to cover their Ultra program in the Mediterranean by arranging "chance" encounters with patrol aircraft, before moving in to attack with more significant forces. I imagine the US did much of the same.
RE: OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 8:33 pm
by spence
In 1940 the British let the city of Coventry get creamed one night even though they had perfect knowledge of a forthcoming Luftwaffe attack. They knew that any action they took would cue the Germans to the fact that their (the German's) codes were not secure and; given the state of nighttime defenses at the time; would do little to prevent civilian casualties anyway.
RE: OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 8:48 pm
by spence
From the article:
Decoded Japanese Army Water Transport Code messages also provided the Allies with the convoy's route, speed, daily noon positions and destination
If you are looking for something, ANYTHING on the ocean, you simply can not ask for more information than this.
I've read that every Japanese merchant ship was required by IJHQ regulations to report its noon position to whatever HQ it was serving in this compromised Army Water Transportation Code and further that this code was compromised pretty early on during the course of the war.
RE: OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:33 pm
by Leandros
ORIGINAL: spence
In 1940 the British let the city of Coventry get creamed one night even though they had perfect knowledge of a forthcoming Luftwaffe attack. They knew that any action they took would cue the Germans to the fact that their (the German's) codes were not secure and; given the state of nighttime defenses at the time; would do little to prevent civilian casualties anyway.
That exact twist on the story has been disputed:
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-11486219
Fred
RE: OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Sat Feb 25, 2017 10:35 pm
by Leandros
ORIGINAL: Scholomancer
I know the British attempted to cover their Ultra program in the Mediterranean by arranging "chance" encounters with patrol aircraft, before moving in to attack with more significant forces. I imagine the US did much of the same.
My impression is that the Americans were less secretive than the British on the use of Ultra.
Fred
RE: OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 5:51 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Leandros
ORIGINAL: spence
In 1940 the British let the city of Coventry get creamed one night even though they had perfect knowledge of a forthcoming Luftwaffe attack. They knew that any action they took would cue the Germans to the fact that their (the German's) codes were not secure and; given the state of nighttime defenses at the time; would do little to prevent civilian casualties anyway.
That exact twist on the story has been disputed:
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-11486219
Fred
warspite1
Thank-you for the link Leandros.
In 1940 the British let the city of Coventry get creamed one night
How very eloquent....
I must confess I do find it amazing just how many people appear desperate to believe that leaders of democratic countries are homicidal loons on the Q.T. I mean Churchill and Coventry, Roosevelt and Pearl, Bush and 911 [:(]
RE: OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 8:23 am
by spence
I must confess I do find it amazing just how many people appear desperate to believe that leaders of democratic countries are homicidal loons on the Q.T. I mean Churchill and Coventry, Roosevelt and Pearl, Bush and 911
If you're Hitler, Stalin, or Kim Jung Un you stand any such thinkers up against the wall for having such thoughts before they can express them.
RE: OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 10:11 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: spence
I must confess I do find it amazing just how many people appear desperate to believe that leaders of democratic countries are homicidal loons on the Q.T. I mean Churchill and Coventry, Roosevelt and Pearl, Bush and 911
If you're Hitler, Stalin, or Kim Jung Un you stand any such thinkers up against the wall for having such thoughts before they can express them.
warspite1
Why would Kim Jung Un shoot someone just because he thinks Winston Churchill knew about the raid on Coventry?
RE: OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 10:47 am
by MakeeLearn
ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: spence
I must confess I do find it amazing just how many people appear desperate to believe that leaders of democratic countries are homicidal loons on the Q.T. I mean Churchill and Coventry, Roosevelt and Pearl, Bush and 911
If you're Hitler, Stalin, or Kim Jung Un you stand any such thinkers up against the wall for having such thoughts before they can express them.
warspite1
Why would Kim Jung Un shoot someone just because he thinks Winston Churchill knew about the raid on Coventry?
Because the machine that turns people into lubricant is being repaired.

RE: OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 12:55 pm
by warspite1
Good point

RE: OT: Take Ichi Convoy
Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 1:09 pm
by MakeeLearn
....[:D]