Page 1 of 1

LF a game, prefer multiplayer but 2 player also ok

Posted: Mon Oct 02, 2017 12:28 pm
by jjdenver
Hi,

I'm ok to take either side. I'd prefer to get into a multiplayer game where both sides agree to fast pace and both players on each side are empowered to make decisions for the other when not available.

I am also interested in a 2-player game as either side.

Note that I'm willing to play using Vassal if you don't prefer MWIF.

Thanks

RE: LF a game, prefer multiplayer but 2 player also ok

Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 2:19 am
by davidc
Hi,

Did you get any takers?

I too would like to be part of a multi-player experience.
I can play you head-to-head until then if you like.
Version 2.5.5
Timezone: Australian Central Standard UTC +10:30
I have played the boardgame, CWIF and now MWIF.
Email with MWIF is my preference until netplay resolved.

Thanks

RE: LF a game, prefer multiplayer but 2 player also ok

Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2017 3:47 pm
by jjdenver
I could still go for a multiplayer game. A new one would be jolly, but I'd be willing to step into an ongoing multiplayer game if a player needs to drop because his life is too hectic to do turns in a timely fashion....provided the rest of the players are committed to moving the game along in a timely way and to a conclusion. My skill level is intermediate. I'm a long time WIF player but rusty.

RE: LF a game, prefer multiplayer but 2 player also ok

Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2017 9:00 am
by nilssone85
I am interested in jumping back on the WiF-wagon. What timezone are we talking about here?

RE: LF a game, prefer multiplayer but 2 player also ok

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 12:49 pm
by jjdenver
*bump*

nilson didn't prefer the timezone difference, so I'm still LF game, prefer US timezones but could probably work with any timezone, it would just go more slowly.