Basic explanation of unit sizes and relations with strength/supply

The sequel of the legendary wargame with a complete graphics and interface overhaul, major new gameplay and design features such as full naval combat modelling, improved supply handling, numerous increases to scenario parameters to better support large scenarios, and integrated PBEM++.
Post Reply
tarzanofmars
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2017 5:15 pm

Basic explanation of unit sizes and relations with strength/supply

Post by tarzanofmars »

So I have some questions that are kind of difficult to describe. I couldn't find a detailed explanation of what constitutes a squad/platoon as far as strength and numbers of actual men.

Example I'm making an Indian Wars campaign (already have 98,000 hex map that is 90% complete) and instead of using the format that an older Custer scenario used- which was the entire 7th Cavalry was a single regiment counter made up of 18 'companies' or 'troops'- I want to create each company as a counter and have the units within be squads (or even preferably individuals).

How do I define the size of the squad? What if I wanted them to be individual soldiers? What would happen if I set the unit counter as a company and put 75 Mounted Troop (Breech Loaders)?

So if I did this and left the anti-personnel, anti-armor and defense ratings the same, just rename them, what, if any downsides will I incur?

Can the increased supply needs be countered by adjusting the map/force level supply and readiness costs and the supply distances?

I hope my question makes sense, I've attached a photo of the original regiment makeup and the one I have made. Yes the combat power of mine is much greater, but the Indians will be using the same format and thus be relative and balanced.

Thoughts or advice?

Standard Regiment makeup
Image

My current approach
Image

Image

Part of my in progress map of Wyoming, 2/3 of Montana, 1/4 of South Dakota, Nebraska and slivers of Utah, Colorado and Utah
Image

User avatar
cdcool
Posts: 717
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 9:44 am
Location: New York/Chicago
Contact:

RE: Basic explanation of unit sizes and relations with strength/supply

Post by cdcool »

Good Questions
Chief Admin
Computer War and Exploration Games
Facebook Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/compute ... tion.games
User avatar
sPzAbt653
Posts: 10158
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 7:11 am
Location: east coast, usa

RE: Basic explanation of unit sizes and relations with strength/supply

Post by sPzAbt653 »

You can do anything that you want, you are the designer, TOAW gives you all the tools to work with. You need a rough outline of what you want to do, then pound it out in the Force Editor, then play it a little bit to see how it feels. When you are making something so specific, it is normal to have to revamp the OOB once or twice before you get it the way that you want. In addition to determining the proper composition of the units, there are many settings to consider. I don't think they used squads or platoons back then. I think companies of 80-100 men were the standard smallest unit. I'm no expert in the period though.

Sounds like an interesting scenario, and the map looks nice [:)]
tarzanofmars
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2017 5:15 pm

RE: Basic explanation of unit sizes and relations with strength/supply

Post by tarzanofmars »

Awesome, thanks for the feedback and tips. I was hoping this was the case and I have play tested a couple of rounds and it went well, it sounds like I just will need to just keep play testing as I go (which is fun anyway!).
Post Reply

Return to “The Operational Art of War IV”