Page 1 of 1
Poor Geometry / Fair Geometry
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 12:55 pm
by josant
The vehicles of the database have marked poor geometry or fair geometry or none boxes, What is better, mark the fair geometry box or not to mark?, For example Panther with fair geometry is better than a Panther without this marked. I noted that modern equipment (equipment that is very sloped) dont have this boxes marked.
RE: Poor Geometry / Fair Geometry
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 12:59 pm
by Oberst_Klink
ORIGINAL: josant
The vehicles of the database have marked poor geometry or fair geometry or none boxes, What is better, mark the fair geometry box or not to mark?, For example Panther with fair geometry is better than a Panther without this marked. I noted that modern equipment (equipment that is very sloped) dont have this boxes marked.
Companiero Jose!
Modern armour is reactive (in most cases) and not sloped (impossible yet to bent the ceramic/armour/laminate yet); that's reflected in one of the other settings.
See:
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blindaje_Chobham
Klink, Oberst
RE: Poor Geometry / Fair Geometry
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2018 6:13 pm
by Zorch
Is this Euclidean or Non-Euclidean?
RE: Poor Geometry / Fair Geometry
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 10:17 am
by josant
Yes I know this, but in game terms, what is better; mark the Fair Geometry box, or, not to mark?
RE: Poor Geometry / Fair Geometry
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2018 11:07 am
by Oberst_Klink
ORIGINAL: josant
Yes I know this, but in game terms, what is better; mark the Fair Geometry box, or, not to mark?
Have to do some research, but AFAIR, Bob did some documents for the back then called BioEd equipment editor.
Klink, Oberst