Unrealistic Government Relocations
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2018 2:26 pm
While playing a 1939 campaign game as the Axis, against the AI, I experienced a number of repeated UK government relocations that, in my opinion, were just not realistic. After I took London with my forces, the government moved to Manchester, which was still well under Allied control and quite reasonable. However, at one point a Partisan unit popped up in London (being a newbie at the game I didn't know that I needed an Axis unit there to prevent this), and immediately the government moved back to London, despite this being many hexes behind enemy lines. There were no Axis units anywhere near London at the time, but it is not realistic, again in my opinion, that the government would move into a location surrounded by enemy held territory and far behind the front line.
A similar event occurred later as well after I had taken Manchester, with the government relocating from Scotland to Manchester when it was well behind enemy lines (in this case a Partisan unit from Liverpool moved one hex into Manchester triggering the government relocation).
I would suggest that a more realistic criteria would be that the city to relocate to must be surrounded by friendly owned hexes and that at least one regular friendly miltary unit be in the city. I don't believe that the presence of partisans justifies a government relocation.
Thoughts?
A similar event occurred later as well after I had taken Manchester, with the government relocating from Scotland to Manchester when it was well behind enemy lines (in this case a Partisan unit from Liverpool moved one hex into Manchester triggering the government relocation).
I would suggest that a more realistic criteria would be that the city to relocate to must be surrounded by friendly owned hexes and that at least one regular friendly miltary unit be in the city. I don't believe that the presence of partisans justifies a government relocation.
Thoughts?