Matrix Games Forums

It seems I just had like dozenth PBEM opponent drop on me, stop sending turns, stop responding to mails etc.

All this after we BOTH stated in our opening mails how we hate quitters, how we'll do our best to play at least till the autumn of 42 (or until we have clear winner etc.). I was Jap in this game, and my initial offensive was going kinda OK, but not so well as to make him leave the game or surrender. He lost 2 (two) minor ships so far (mid-June).

Don't know what to do. In my personal records I count all them dropouts as "victories" for me but it's small consolation...

What's especially depressing - I've had serious players, UV beta testers, UV modders... quitting our games, just stopping responding to mails just like that!! Don't know who to trust anymore!!

Guys this is BAD manners!

At least, one should have guts and honor to say "I SURRENDER" in his last mail... That's the least thing one should expect. This last player I am talking about (i won't name him, but he's on UV game credits no less!), used MY whining (I was telling how disappointed I was with my Bettys and Nells) as an excuse to quit the game under premises "yes I know you're disappointed with your aircraft, and I got busy lately, so that's it, we'll call it a draw and goodbye"!!

Ridicolous! This is NOT a draw. I think my Bettys are crap, and that my options are severely limited, but I don't surrender because of that. One of the ideas behind this game (especially as Jap) is trying to play under frustrating, adverse conditions. I WANT to try that. I will whine, but I won't abandon the game because of it.

I am thinking of starting a "black list" of PBEM quitters but this would seem small minded and petty...

So, lets rather start a "Gold List" of players that do their duty honorably, always respond to mails, play to the bitter end, and remain dignified both in victory and in defeat.

Apollo 11 is such player. Unfortunatelly I don't know of any others, but I'd love to know their names.

From what I gathered from their epic game, Kid and Crocky also qualify.

BTW, I'd love to start a SERIOUS game of #17 or #19, any side - if you consider yourself honorable, persistent, NOT a quitter, NOT losing interest in game easily, you know you'll find a time to play at least turn a day - please, PLEASE, *PLEASE* contact me.

We may whine, we may curse, we may take days long pauses in our game if needs be, we may do anything that is humanely reasonable, but we won't quit unless in a desperate, "Yamamoto and MacArthur would surender too" kind of situation.

So? PLEASE. It has come to that I am ready to PAY to find worthy PBEM partners!

Oleg

Hi

I had this problem at first...I started way too many games and 3-4 just disappeared. So I stuck with the ones who did not and have been playing against them ever since. I hardly ever take up a game against someone I have never played against anymore.

My list of fine players

Mogami
Kid
Arto
DpStafford
Bosun
Gus

I've played many more but these are the players I play against now, except for Gus... I had good fun playing against Spooky too but it was a long time ago.

Started a testing WITP game with Nikademus and Snigbert since they are on the team and I am sure they are OK too.

Oh as the IJN I fight to the finish....in other words if Rabaul falls there is no point but that means my IJN game usually lasts till mid 1943. In my current IJN game vs Mogami we are at September 1943 and I am still giving him a good game. I know I will loose but I love to defend too!

i haven't played that many opponents to the finish but Soulblazer sticks it out(of course he is winning:). I wouldn't take all this too seriously. Alot of people can't take failure and its easy to back out of a pbem game. Just move on and don't waste your energy or time on the back-outs.

Maybe your too good Oleg

Originally posted by Cap Mandrake
Maybe your too good Oleg

No I am not

Actually I am convinced Japs CANNOT win in PBEM unless:

a) Allied player is an idiot
b) Allied player is LOT less experienced than Jap player
c) Allied player QUITS after he loses his first CV, loses interest etc.

Yet, 80% of my PBEMs were as Japs. I love challenge. Most of the times it was option c)...

Maybe in some perverse way it is historic? Ie. Japs were counting on Allies not having the will to fight on...

O.

Originally posted by Oleg Mastruko
No I am not

Actually I am convinced Japs CANNOT win in PBEM unless:

a) Allied player is an idiot
b) Allied player is LOT less experienced than Jap player
c) Allied player QUITS after he loses his first CV, loses interest etc.

Yet, 80% of my PBEMs were as Japs. I love challenge. Most of the times it was option c)...

Maybe in some perverse way it is historic? Ie. Japs were counting on Allies not having the will to fight on...

O.

option d) IJN opponent is U2 and you will loose:D

I think if the IJN players gets a good start and is given time to build a defensive line that is deep he stands a good chance of getting a draw or a minor victory.

In my IJN game against DpStafford 90% of my forces where keept fighting in NG way too long so I could not move them to stop an offensive against Lunga. The PM operation needs to be quick and painless for things to go my way. This game I expect to loose but I'll give Dan a good game to the finish...Banzai!

I NEVER start an IJN game expecting to loose but to win! If that is not possible it does not really matter since I am having fun anyway

I must say, all this talk about the prospects of allies versus IJN is confusing.
In another thread, Yamamoto is talking about what happens to ETA ships from PH after he has just captured Noumea.

I remember reading elsewhere that one of the best allied strategies was to put virtually everything in Brisbane and Noumea and concentrate on doing nothing till very late in the game because resistance was futile.

Originally posted by Mike_B20

I remember reading elsewhere that one of the best allied strategies was to put virtually everything in Brisbane and Noumea and concentrate on doing nothing till very late in the game because resistance was futile.

I start moving around October or November unless the IJN players tries to capture something I want to hold (Lugainville or Australia)....still I don't rush to the scene at once but I want to use my airforce to do damage for a while and then send my CVs when I want to. I want decisive battles on my terms not on my opponent's. I try not to do anything at all till I have 5 USN CVs

Oleg....once I lose the games I have in progress now, maybe we can play

I have one going where I lost 2 carriers in the first week as Allies (I foolishly took a double carrier sighting near Rabaul as proof that I could beat up on his boys near Tulagi) its now late July '42 and I am trying to hang on to PM. I will probably lose by sudden death as he has the resources to possibly take an Australian Port ir PM falls. I still haven't given up though...kinda like a Chihuahua barking at a Doberman. I have found it harder to complete turns quickly as the forces get bigger and the danger increases...I don't see how you chaps can churn these out in 15 minutes.

Originally posted by Cap Mandrake

I. I have found it harder to complete turns quickly as the forces get bigger and the danger increases...I don't see how you chaps can churn these out in 15 minutes.

3-5 minutes for me

Originally posted by U2
3-5 minutes for me

Now hold on there...it takes longer than that to review some combat replays, even with the extraneous detail turned off.


We are talking about Earth minutes right? Open the Pod Bay doors HAL.

Originally posted by Cap Mandrake
Now hold on there...it takes longer than that to review some combat replays, even with the extraneous detail turned off.

We are talking about Earth minutes right? Open the Pod Bay doors HAL.

The idea is - long term planning.

You make your strategic plan on turn X, and then for the next Y turns you just review orders with few touches here and there. In theory, it really does not take very long to play...

Of course, from time to time you have to spend more time reviewing your whole strategy etc. taking an full hour or even more for such, strategy-defining turns.

Believe it or not, I am aware that US player may gather some intel from the times of savefiles, and sometimes take care to artificially make them more apart.

Ie. if the combatreport is generated on 14:30, and turn savefile bears timestamp of 14:35 - that is clearly only a routine turn. If the turn savefile is hour away - whoa, something huge must be brewin' on the IJN side!

Yes, the UV brings out the best in men

O.

I did not include the time it takes to watch the replay:)

Originally posted by Oleg Mastruko
The idea is - long term planning.

You make your strategic plan on turn X, and then for the next Y turns you just review orders with few touches here and there. In theory, it really does not take very long to play...

Ie. if the combatreport is generated on 14:30, and turn savefile bears timestamp of 14:35 - that is clearly only a routine turn. If the turn savefile is hour away - whoa, something huge must be brewin' on the IJN side!

Yes, the UV brings out the best in men

O.

Yes that's the way I play too, long term planning. Most turns I just have to end and send.

Now I have never thought about that last thing you wrote...clever man:)

Originally posted by Oleg Mastruko

Ie. if the combatreport is generated on 14:30, and turn savefile bears timestamp of 14:35 - that is clearly only a routine turn. If the turn savefile is hour away - whoa, something huge must be brewin' on the IJN side!

O.

Hmm. If I open up the combatreport.txt and save it again it will have a new timestamp, right? I guess I just added 10 seconds on to how long my turns are going to take now.

Yamamoto

Originally posted by Oleg Mastruko


Believe it or not, I am aware that US player may gather some intel from the times of savefiles, and sometimes take care to artificially make them more apart.

Ie. if the combatreport is generated on 14:30, and turn savefile bears timestamp of 14:35 - that is clearly only a routine turn. If the turn savefile is hour away - whoa, something huge must be brewin' on the IJN side!

Yes, the UV brings out the best in men

O.

That is a dang clever inference Hadn't thought of that either.......but for every measure there is a countermeasure. If you want to make your opponent worry, maybe even fatigue his fighter cap a bit, then open the email in the morning before work..generate the combatsave..then do the turn at night.

Conversely, to induce him to let his guard down when you sally forth a big amphibious force or plot a big raid and take a long time on the move, save your turn when you are ready...copy to desktop or rename or something...then rerun your opponents email turn to regenerate the combatsave with a new time stamp (in 2.30 it is alleged to be exactly the same). Next, import your turn..hit endsav...bingo you have a 2 minute turn

Here are my votes for the Gold List:-

Luskan
DoomedMantis
Drongo
Iron Duke
Crocky
Caltone
Nasrullah

These guys will give you all an honest game, prompt turn replies and none of them are quitters.

My turns, inclusive of watching the replays, take 20-45 mins.

My planning involves typing notes onto a note pad file.

Mostly I play 6 turns every 7 days.

I am looking forward to WITP but I will not play the long campaign. Not even against the AI.

On the topic of 5 minute turns...don't y'all find a need to alter TF courses based on new intelligence (eg. sub sightings), massage the air groups, change recon targets, etc. ? How can you do all that in 5 minutes?? It seems superhuman.

Not every turn. If my planes flew, then I'll check them. If not, no need. Often only small changes are needed in order to affect detailed plans allready in place. And there are many borring stretches in the game.