Matrix Games Forums

b If random roll 0–100% < Experience % the unit takes addition
effectiveness loss.

The above is from the Combat Effectiveness Loss Table on page 101.

Is that a typo? Shouldn't the roll be > the Experience %

Or maybe I misunderstand.

A unit has experience of 90 and the dice roll is less than 90 then takes effectiveness loss.
A unit has experience of 60 and the dice roll is less than 60 then takes effectiveness loss.

At least that's how I read it.
.

That's a type the above paragraph states it correctly.

It seems counter intuitive. I would think a unit that is more experienced would be less likely to loose more effectiveness. But the table appears to suggest the opposite is true. Less experienced units loose the least effectiveness.

So a unit that is 90% experienced will lose more effectiveness than the 60% experienced over the course of time.

Right. That's not intuitiv.
As Michael T described, a Unit with a higher experience should be less vulnerable to effects, resulting in losses of effectivness.
???

I meant TYPO not type. What you guys are saying is correct. The more experience the less chance of losing MORE effectiveness. Too many things going on at once for me.

Thanks for clearing that up.

Too many things going on at once for me.

It's your own fault [:)]

Whipping up everyone in to a frenzy in anticipation [:D]

ORIGINAL: Michael T

Too many things going on at once for me.

It's your own fault [:)]

Whipping up everyone in to a frenzy in anticipation [:D]

And then he goes and posts a pic of New Guinea![X(]

There is a contradiction between the rules and the chart for Effectiveness Recovery for snow and blizzard.

Page 67-69.

Rules say -20%/-40% for snow/blizzard. Chart says -10%/-20%.

Which is it?

page 69 is correct -10%/-20%.

Thanks for catching that. I am adding errors to be updated in the manual the 1st patch