Targeting Profile Questions
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2020 7:09 pm
Thanks Alvaro for your previous response.
Alvaro:
It's the targeting profile. If you have a transport with a 2-3 ships it's targeting profile is lower than alone.
If you escort an invading force with 2-3 ships it has a lower target profile.
Just wondering:
How is the targeting profile lowered? ie by the number of ships present? The type of ship present? How much AA is present in the fleet? Is there a formula that can be shared?
for example these numbers are approximates:
-10 transports without cover will all be sunk if there is enough air to strike at it if they invade one at a time.
-10 transports without cover and invading in pairs, 1/2 will always make it to shore.
-However, if the transport has a CV group with it, then 30% of the time the transport will be sunk and 6% of the time you will lose the CV group entirely. (ie: CV groups provide counter air cover support for the transports)
-If a BB grp is with the transport, then the transports will be sunk approximately 80% of the time.
I didn't test the other groups.
Alvaro:
It's the targeting profile. If you have a transport with a 2-3 ships it's targeting profile is lower than alone.
If you escort an invading force with 2-3 ships it has a lower target profile.
Just wondering:
How is the targeting profile lowered? ie by the number of ships present? The type of ship present? How much AA is present in the fleet? Is there a formula that can be shared?
for example these numbers are approximates:
-10 transports without cover will all be sunk if there is enough air to strike at it if they invade one at a time.
-10 transports without cover and invading in pairs, 1/2 will always make it to shore.
-However, if the transport has a CV group with it, then 30% of the time the transport will be sunk and 6% of the time you will lose the CV group entirely. (ie: CV groups provide counter air cover support for the transports)
-If a BB grp is with the transport, then the transports will be sunk approximately 80% of the time.
I didn't test the other groups.