Page 1 of 1
Cutting off Murmansk
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 4:59 pm
by PanzerMike
I am not sure what the effect is of:
1) Taking Murmansk
2) Cutting off the rail line from Murmansk
Is there any effect on Lend Lease by either of these? Can Lend Lease be cut off this way?
RE: Cutting off Murmansk
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 5:53 pm
by AlvaroSousa
In the winter of course.
RE: Cutting off Murmansk
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 6:04 pm
by PanzerMike
Ok, if in winter either Murmansk is taken by the Axis or the railroad is cut, Lend Lease can not reach the USSR?
If so, how does the game handle the PP's if the Allied player forgets to cancel the LL convoy after the Axis cuts off Murmansk. Are they simply wasted (ie subtracted from the UK and not added to the USSR?
RE: Cutting off Murmansk
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 10:06 pm
by AlvaroSousa
It doesn't ship em.
RE: Cutting off Murmansk
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2020 10:06 pm
by AlvaroSousa
An issue with the last beta I need to fix tonight.
RE: Cutting off Murmansk
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2020 12:54 pm
by RPKUPK
Specifically,Alvaro, please tell us what we need to know about Murmansk as the German! Obviously capturing the city itself is the goal. But what are the supply facts around the rail line south into Russia. 1) why effect during winter only? 2)Does supply ever improve for the Finnish-German attack towards that rail line, then especially the one out to Archangel? Other than a slow plodding one hex per month supply truck-driven offensive.
RE: Cutting off Murmansk
Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2020 5:42 pm
by Windfire
I suspect in the summer the convoys can go to Archangel if Murmansk is captured or the rail line south of Murmansk is cut. Archangel gets locked in by ice in in the winter so convoys to Archangel would not be an option in the winter.
RE: Cutting off Murmansk
Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 10:56 am
by RPKUPK
Okay thanks, that makes sense but that doesn't answer my full question completely.
So I'm still waiting for Alvaro to explain the supply situation for the attack to the Russia-Murmansk rail line and then a lack of timely rail hex repair on the way to Archangel.
RE: Cutting off Murmansk
Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 11:08 am
by PanzerMike
Cutting off may be become somewhat different

RE: Cutting off Murmansk
Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 11:49 am
by AlvaroSousa
Lend lease is cut in winter by taking murmansk. As for supply follow the rail lines. Use hqs to extend supply range.
RE: Cutting off Murmansk
Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 5:14 pm
by James Taylor
Hey Al, any chance we can get a linking effect from HQs like SC has?
RE: Cutting off Murmansk
Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2020 9:33 pm
by AlvaroSousa
When you click an HQ a small orange flag appears on units within it's range.
RE: Cutting off Murmansk
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2020 2:43 pm
by James Taylor
I'm talking about the supply feature, one HQ extends the supply net to another HQ which provides supply to the units.
RE: Cutting off Murmansk
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2020 11:47 pm
by RPKUPK
Yeah who came up with that idea of linking hq's?? Let's hear from the man. I understand hq's increase the supply by 1. So if you go along the road towards the Murmansk rail line the maximum supply is 1 + 1 = 2, since there is no rail line, just a road, is that correct? Then, one could burn supply trucks on the HQ that would increase supply to adjacent units and then you can burn supply trucks on the unit itself, is that right?
RE: Cutting off Murmansk
Posted: Thu Feb 27, 2020 6:41 am
by AlvaroSousa
HQs do not chain