Early game leader management and secretaries
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2020 2:48 pm
Hi all
Have just started a new game on 1.02, to get the full benefits of the patch, and am actually properly reviewing my leaders at the start of the game. I noticed that my secretary is a middle-aged CAP IV leader with decent base stats and a couple of good governance skills. My starting governor, as always, is a nitwit with CAP I and literally no governance related skills at all. She is utterly useless in her role and will remain so indefinitely because of her very low CAP. She's also unaligned. About the only positive thing I can say is that she is also middle-aged so she's only ~20 years from retirement.
Should I just immediately sack her and then my secretary so I can place my secretary as governor next turn? Obviously there is an immediate PP and relations cost but that will work out.
More generally, are there any advantages to having a skilled secretary or is having a skilled secretary always a waste of a leader? I realise, for balance reasons presumably, that you cannot directly appoint your secretary but is it generally best to try to make sure they are as poor a leader as possible?
Have just started a new game on 1.02, to get the full benefits of the patch, and am actually properly reviewing my leaders at the start of the game. I noticed that my secretary is a middle-aged CAP IV leader with decent base stats and a couple of good governance skills. My starting governor, as always, is a nitwit with CAP I and literally no governance related skills at all. She is utterly useless in her role and will remain so indefinitely because of her very low CAP. She's also unaligned. About the only positive thing I can say is that she is also middle-aged so she's only ~20 years from retirement.
Should I just immediately sack her and then my secretary so I can place my secretary as governor next turn? Obviously there is an immediate PP and relations cost but that will work out.
More generally, are there any advantages to having a skilled secretary or is having a skilled secretary always a waste of a leader? I realise, for balance reasons presumably, that you cannot directly appoint your secretary but is it generally best to try to make sure they are as poor a leader as possible?