Matrix Games Forums

I don't want to play this game
1- whose AI takes too long to respond![>:]
2- which I am told has great potential!
3- which does not have an scenarios editor!

Uh, what game. [&:]
Or was that a universal statement?

4 - which doesn't have a random scenario generator.

5 - which has an old [but familiar, and still quite serviceable] UI

6 - which doesn't have true 3D graphics

7 - that wont install on my old PC

8 - that is not also have a steamkey from matrix

9 - and my GOD , all the games are now gigabytes, they used to fit elite on a 1mb disk

10-Easy to learn, but hard to master is a turn-off for me. This statement is over used in hyping a game!

ORIGINAL: mainsworthy

9 - and my GOD , all the games are now gigabytes, they used to fit elite on a 1mb disk

I don't know any 1mb (mb = millibit?) disks, floppy or otherwise. Otherwise game was originally made with/for BBC Micro with 64 KB of RAM, or less. And the entire game had to fit on that RAM! For your information, games are still being made with such restraints/restrictions. Not every new game is in gigabyte category (I bet most aren't). Review of one wargame made for the earliest PCs from couple years ago. Game in question is a sequel for 2 other games that were made for Commodore 64 & Vic-20.

That people endlessly whine about because it doesn't fit their #1-10 it's all about me niche. [:D]

1.The U.I. is too complicated (I don't want to invest the time)

2.This game has been done too much (I want something else)

3. The O.O.B. is terrible (I can't exploit it to my liking)

Idea (thought behind the idea)

11. Well most wargames are WW'2 related. Maybe easier to make these games. I hope wargaming move out comfort zone something special as 'Hades' as design.

What you described reminds me of the age of empires from 1997 [:D]
[:D]