Actual Field Example vs Model Design
Posted: Sun Dec 05, 2021 9:50 pm
Im trying to understand why my newly researched Quad MG actual field design does not match up to the model design?
Model: Soft Atk = 168/664 vs. Actual Design = 42/166; hard attack is 84/168 vs. 21/42; Hits are the same for each @ 336
In all other cases, new designs have superseded older models but the twinbarrel MG is better in firepower that the field example of the Quad...
Thanks for any help in explaining to me...
Model: Soft Atk = 168/664 vs. Actual Design = 42/166; hard attack is 84/168 vs. 21/42; Hits are the same for each @ 336
In all other cases, new designs have superseded older models but the twinbarrel MG is better in firepower that the field example of the Quad...
Thanks for any help in explaining to me...