Page 1 of 1

[1.10.04] Possible Policy Speech Issue (Low Priority)

Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2022 10:42 pm
by mroyer

Should choice [A] to be +7 to commerce rather than having two enforcement options?
It seems industry more closely aligns with commerce than enforcement.

-Mark R.


Image

RE: [1.10.04] Possible Policy Speech Issue (Low Priority)

Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2022 8:42 am
by zgrssd
Public Industry is generally not Commerce. Only Private Industiry is realy in the "Commerce" sector.
So I would expect A to be Government.

RE: [1.10.04] Possible Policy Speech Issue (Low Priority)

Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2022 9:04 pm
by mroyer
ORIGINAL: zgrssd

Public Industry is generally not Commerce. Only Private Industiry is realy in the "Commerce" sector.
So I would expect A to be Government.

Makes sense.
Either way, two enforcements seem off, maybe.
-Mark R.

RE: [1.10.04] Possible Policy Speech Issue (Low Priority)

Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2022 1:48 am
by Don_Kiyote
It looks like a Government task.
Unless they are Private Industries, which would be really hard. But that would be Commerce then.
imho
-----
Historically, Socialist government models have been very good at accelerating industrial development. This includes war economies, which are also Socialist.