pz501 wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 5:58 pm
TBR186 wrote: Mon Sep 05, 2022 3:02 pm
Haven't been chosen either, so I doubt "standing" or activity on the NWS forums played any role in selection
I don't know what the criteria is/was for selection, but I would imagine the programmer and devs feel more comfortable with people they already know from RTW and RTW 2 testing.
Folks... I don't know what was in the developer's minds and I haven't seen their criteria and I certainly don't speak for the RTW team in any way, shape or form. However I have been a successful applicant for many beta teams including:
* Europa Universalis (the original... yes, I am that old)
* Flashpoint Germany
* World in Flames
* Strategic Command: American Civil War
* RTW3 ... and many more.
Here are the things I list in my applications:
* my IT background including being on many software development teams in a commercial environment
* semi-retired so I can devote time to the work
* I'm autistic so have high attention to detail (Hurray !!! Finally a positive from being autistic)
* I only ever betatest one game at a time so I can focus all my attention on that game.
* My PC comfortably exceeds the minimum spec for the game
I would believe (without any proof) that Matrix has a list of people who have provided good betatest work in the past and if any of those people apply for a slot then they are almost automatically greenlighted. Certainly I see the same names popping up repeatedly in these testing teams (Hello gwgardner). So if you aren't already on this mythical list, then how do you get your foot in the door?
Well if I ran Matrix and was considering a person's application to be a tester then I would review every entry that person made in the Matrix Forums for the last (say) three years:
* I don't care if they trashed a game - I'm interested in how methodical they were in their analysis or did they just write "This game sucks" without providing proper feedback?
* Is their language respectful to their peers and to Matrix staff?
* Do their posts get bogged down in acrimonious issues of personal preferences, or do they show respect to other peoples tastes in games?"
* Do they ever lead a discussion? For example, in another game forum I once opined on the possibility of a strategic WWII game where airpower had never been invented. Some people immediately jumped in to aggressively and mindlessly hose it down as impossible while others went along with the Thought Experiment. Which sort of person are you?
All of which probably doesn't help you in your application to test RTW3, but it might help for RTW4 or for some other game. HINT: Pick a game which you believe is due for an upgrade in the next year or two and become productive in that games forums... it can't hurt. Remember that Developers are interested in what *value* you bring to the team. Start demonstrating that value.
FWIW I bought RTW1 when it was released way back in 2015(?) and at the time I added a few thoughts to the Forums , but I totally skipped RTW2 and only applied for RTW3 when I saw the Matrix Post in Facebook. So I highly doubt selection is based on "... the programmer and devs feel[ing] more comfortable with people they already know from RTW and RTW 2 testing." In my experience Betatesting and Bug reporting is an extremely pragmatic exercise and has little to do with how much you like/dislike a person.
Hope this helps, but remember that everything in this post is just my thoughts based on my experience in a commercial IT environment and does not represent the thoughts, words or deeds of anyone at Matrix
