Rodeo Rhinos?
Posted: Sun Oct 29, 2023 2:33 pm
I've been reading up on Project Strike Rodeo, with a question on my mind: can the same thing be done with other aircraft? I am particularly thinking of the Super Hornet, because LRASM launch capacity seems to be something of a bottleneck which will be coming up in the near future. The best source I have found is this USAF press release:
https://www.53rdwing.af.mil/News/Articl ... ve-jassms/
It implies the following:
1. It was necessary to put the LRASM on CFT stations on the F-15E, rather than on other stations.
2. The problem was that the loading equipment couldn't fit under these stations; the simple expedient of creating new loading equipment solved the problem.
Well, the Super Hornet doesn't have CFT stations and isn't getting them; but, on the other hand, if the problem was the loading equipment, can it also be solved for the Super Hornet?
I would appreciate anyone with knowledge of the actual engineering limitations at play here to provide some explanations for the following questions:
1. Why are all existing strike aircraft limited to two JASSMs?
2. Why is this problem solvable on the F-15E?
3. Is the problem also solvable on other aircraft?
https://www.53rdwing.af.mil/News/Articl ... ve-jassms/
It implies the following:
1. It was necessary to put the LRASM on CFT stations on the F-15E, rather than on other stations.
2. The problem was that the loading equipment couldn't fit under these stations; the simple expedient of creating new loading equipment solved the problem.
Well, the Super Hornet doesn't have CFT stations and isn't getting them; but, on the other hand, if the problem was the loading equipment, can it also be solved for the Super Hornet?
I would appreciate anyone with knowledge of the actual engineering limitations at play here to provide some explanations for the following questions:
1. Why are all existing strike aircraft limited to two JASSMs?
2. Why is this problem solvable on the F-15E?
3. Is the problem also solvable on other aircraft?