Matrix Games Forums

Still a "guess" : Perhaps the game could differentiate the PoH of anti-aircraft missiles with/without lateral thruster against anti-ballistic missiles.

I suspect this incident most likely explains why the USN was so eager to get the PAC-3 (lateral thruster equipped) into the MK-41 VLS. The SMs do not appear to perform as well against ballistic missiles as the Aster-30, which has lateral thrusters

https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/20 ... -missiles/

The operation announced today on social media X (formerly known as Twitter): “On March 21, an EUNAVFOR ASPIDES French ship while providing close protection to merchant shipping in South Red Sea, intercepted and destroyed 3 ballistic missiles posing a direct threat to the FoN.“

https://www.mbda-systems.com/wp-content ... asheet.pdf

ASTER combines a powerful aerodynamic control «PAF» with a direct force control «PIF», using lateral thrusters right at the centre of gravity of the kill vehicle. This innovative control concept provides the weapon with unequalled agility and manoeuvrability within its whole intercept domain, especially at high altitude.

There's already an "attitude control" property in the DB for this. Missiles are either pure-aerodynamic, combined, or pure-thrust controlled. This is factored into the hit probability calculations to a degree.

caelunshun wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 2:46 am There's already an "attitude control" property in the DB for this. Missiles are either pure-aerodynamic, combined, or pure-thrust controlled. This is factored into the hit probability calculations to a degree.

I see what you mean. In fact, I have not understood the mechanism you are talking about until today. Thanks.