Kushan04 wrote: Fri Jun 28, 2024 10:42 pm
Just because it's night doesn't mean they're blind.
I see nothing in your screenshot that indicates the SAM spotted your Hornets with the Mk1 eyeball.
Even a healthy HAWK SAM operator (no blind one) does not see an enemy plane at night at 7nm only with his eyes and classifies the aircraft as multi-role.
You don't fly with your nav lights on during a bomb attack...
I put VIEW/DAY-NIGHT lighting to on and it is dark at 19:32Z and also on the situation Eboreg presented:

- Clipboard03.jpg (8.7 KiB) Viewed 1244 times
I made a test scenario and deleted the rest of the mission, but put a building (small with observer and binocular) next to the Hawk site to test the visuals.
Sometimes(!) the eyball of the Hawk will detect the aircraft, not always.
I'd replicated the situation Contact: BOGEY #170 has been type-classified as: Multirole (Classification by: SAM Bty (
I-HAWK [P1]) [Sensor: Mk1 Eyeball] at
4,6 nm) and checked Scenario Features + Realism and checked weather effects day/ night to on.
Is this also the case with you Eboreg or is it off?
On every occasion, the visual observer will detect the F-18's at arouind 9.8/10,5 Nm.
For example:
12-10-2005 19:11:59 - [NAIL] Contact: BOGEY #28628 has been type-classified as: Multirole (Classification by: Building (Small with Observer) [Sensor: Generic Eyeball with Binoculars] at
9,8 nm)
You can use this test scen to further investigate. I have to work in the garden
One conclusion IMHO is that a visual observer should not detect a fighter aircraft at almost 10 Nm in the middle of the night and also make a classification Multi-role. Maybe he has good ears you say? No you do not hear a F-18 coming at you at 10 Nm
I could not replicate the eyeball of the HAWK site afterwards in the test file which is attached.
Good luck