Page 1 of 1
Valid targets for #72 - GBU-32(V)2/B JDAM [Mk83]?
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2025 8:42 am
by I1066
The "#72 - GBU-32(V)2/B JDAM [Mk83]" states that valid targets are Land Structures (Hard), Land Structures (Soft) and Runways, still it has WRA-records for mobile targets.
Is this correct?
Perhaps stationary non-moving mobile targets are valid targets as long as they do not move (that is, the target-point/coordinates/impact-point is decided when the weapon is released, and it don't really care if it is a land structure or mobile target)?
#72 - GBU-32(V)2/B JDAM [Mk83] in the DB

- 2025-01-11 09_37_57-Database Viewer (DB3K_504).png (98.96 KiB) Viewed 325 times
Re: Valid targets for #72 - GBU-32(V)2/B JDAM [Mk83]?
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2025 11:37 am
by Kobu
As you say, it is possible to launch a GPS-guided bomb at a mobile target as long as it is not moving (you launch at certain coordinates). If the target were to move, you would obviously fail for sure.
Regards
Re: Valid targets for #72 - GBU-32(V)2/B JDAM [Mk83]?
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2025 8:37 pm
by Nikel
Bump.
It is not possible. Is it correct? Should it be BOL capable?
USMC F-35B vs Venezuela S-125M Pechora.

- NP.png (118.85 KiB) Viewed 128 times
Re: Valid targets for #72 - GBU-32(V)2/B JDAM [Mk83]?
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2025 9:14 pm
by Kushan04
I1066 wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 8:42 am
The "#72 - GBU-32(V)2/B JDAM [Mk83]" states that valid targets are Land Structures (Hard), Land Structures (Soft) and Runways, still it has WRA-records for mobile targets.
Is this correct?
Perhaps stationary non-moving mobile targets are valid targets as long as they do not move (that is, the target-point/coordinates/impact-point is decided when the weapon is released, and it don't really care if it is a land structure or mobile target)?
Yes it is correct and it's also probably not completely accurate. JDAMs can't hit mobile targets. Unfortunately right now we do not distinguish between mobile units that are stationary and mobile units that are currently moving.
The WRA being present is probably an oversight on whoever created the entry in the DB.