Matrix Games Forums

In the changelog it is said:

The "Vehicle - Generic GNSS jammer" unit (facility #4582 in the DB) can now be used as intended, by activating any of its onboard generic GNSS jammers. These act on any GNSS-guided weapon within LOS and can disrupt its PNT fixes. When active, their estimated 10%-chance disruption radius is displayed on the map as a semi-transparent yellow circle.

Thanks for the report


Logged 0017075

Why do these units need to have a visible jammer radius, while all other jammers, on ships or airplanes, dont have one?

Shows up correctly here:



And from the "tint" on the black background in your screenshot, it should also be showing up on your system too. Try zooming out a bit?

Knightpawn wrote: Mon Nov 24, 2025 9:19 am Why do these units need to have a visible jammer radius, while all other jammers, on ships or airplanes, dont have one?

With radar jammers, you cannot assume the properties of the radar you'll be affecting, so you cannot estimate the range at which you will affect it.

GNSS receivers are a different story: Most of their operating specs are well known, so you can make a fair estimate of disruption probability-vs-range. Hence the circle.

OK, is more visible depending on the background.

This is the base earth.

I usually only use borders and coastlines, so will miss it

I have a question. Does the GNSS enabler still have any effect on GNSS disruption?

Yes, both abstract and explicit GNSS disruption can be used cooperatively.

2 more questions if you allow me. Will create separate threads if needed.


It is a mobile vehicle, but will not move, sensors active or not.


For a mobile vehicle, is it not too powerful?

The infamous baltic jammer requieres an installation. The vehicle in CMO is less powerful, but not so much.

That looks like a question for DB team (worth to share real word examples so we can model them better)

Not moving is a bug?

Thats not what he's saying. He's saying take the question to the db team.

Nikel wrote: Tue Nov 25, 2025 3:38 pm Not moving is a bug?

I'm not sure, maybe the unit was meant to be a fixed installation but was miss typed as mobile ?

blu3s wrote: Tue Nov 25, 2025 4:10 pm
I'm not sure, maybe the unit was meant to be a fixed installation but was miss typed as mobile ?

OK thanks.

I am not a member of the github site. I someone want to do it, feel free.


According to this page, the powerful russian jammer in the Baltic is a called “Tobol” EW system, an installation at Pionersky .

https://thedefensepost.com/2024/04/24/r ... ming-nato/


Another one is a 40 m antenna at Okunevo.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/benheubl ... 43232-jVXc


Russian jammers overview, vehicles, some of them reportedly very powerful indeed.

https://sprotyvg7.com.ua/wp-content/upl ... 114942.pdf

Or just make an account?
Done in 30 seconds..