LUCAS or: how I stop worrying "drone will rob zoomie's job" and love the loitering munitions
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2026 7:26 am
TDZ article suggests US used Low-Cost Uncrewed Combat Attack System (LUCAS) in recent Operation Absolute Resolve.
https://www.twz.com/air/u-s-kamikaze-dr ... -venezuela
For those who don't know this (neither did I till yesterday): LUCAS is essensially the US copy of (in)famous Iran Shahed-136 drone (designation FLM-136 with same 136 also suggests that). Although currently not included in DB3K, I convinced you can substitude with original Shahed/Gelan series that is already included.
https://www.armyrecognition.com/news/ar ... re-warfare
Such drones, designed for one-way, "kamikaze" attack like missile are distinctively called loitering munitons (LM). LM tends to be used amasse (aka "swarm", but I hate this word because it is used as excess as "gamechanger", and considered as silver bullet).
While you CAN shot them down with fighter/SAM relatively easily (compared with hypersonic missile), this is not so cost-effective and would expose these AD assets, which should be used to counter more competent manned assets, to be hunted (LM goes --> SAM radar active --> LM shot down --> HARM it!). That's why people are so despelate to develop their counter-UAS capabilities such as jammer, laser, and so on.
Quote from TDZ article:
Hope Command player, including me, will develop astute use of drones including these LMs.
https://www.twz.com/air/u-s-kamikaze-dr ... -venezuela
For those who don't know this (neither did I till yesterday): LUCAS is essensially the US copy of (in)famous Iran Shahed-136 drone (designation FLM-136 with same 136 also suggests that). Although currently not included in DB3K, I convinced you can substitude with original Shahed/Gelan series that is already included.
https://www.armyrecognition.com/news/ar ... re-warfare
Such drones, designed for one-way, "kamikaze" attack like missile are distinctively called loitering munitons (LM). LM tends to be used amasse (aka "swarm", but I hate this word because it is used as excess as "gamechanger", and considered as silver bullet).
While you CAN shot them down with fighter/SAM relatively easily (compared with hypersonic missile), this is not so cost-effective and would expose these AD assets, which should be used to counter more competent manned assets, to be hunted (LM goes --> SAM radar active --> LM shot down --> HARM it!). That's why people are so despelate to develop their counter-UAS capabilities such as jammer, laser, and so on.
Quote from TDZ article:
Careful use of LM, with conventional manned assets, will make strike much more effective, as we saw in Carcas.Long-range kamikaze drones would have also offered a way to stimulate enemy air defenses, helping to expose their exact locations and provide emissions to hone in on, after which they could then be struck by other platforms or avoided entirely. The U.S. spent months cataloging Venezuela’s electronic order of battle from standoff distances, but road mobile systems are something of a wild card. If they radiate, they could be rapidly geolocated and destroyed. Similar drones could have been employed purely as decoys or for stand-in (close proximity) jamming of key radars and communications systems, depending on their exact configuration.
Hope Command player, including me, will develop astute use of drones including these LMs.