Page 1 of 1
[FIXED] 1892 Phalanx to ineffective?
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2026 11:02 am
by Swant
Phalanx only mange 1 or 2 shots against subsonic missiles and each shot only has a 1% chance to hit.
The test scenario has two diffrent types of missiles but with the same result.
Re: 1892 Phalanx to ineffective?
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2026 12:08 pm
by Nikel
This is similar to erick33 post.
https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopi ... 3#p5278153
In the case of the Phalanx the nominal PH is much higher than with the guns, but there is a 60% penalty due to lack of director, when there is a working director, the AN/VPS-2.
20mm/85 Mk15 Phalanx Blk 0 Burst [200 rnds] MISS: Gun (20mm/85 Mk15 Phalanx Blk 0 Burst [200 rnds]) is attacking HY-2 [C-201, CSSC-3 Seersucker, Land-Only] #106 with a base-Ph of 70%. Base-Ph adjusted for distance: 70%. Target speed modifier: -25%. Weapon has been fired without director control (manual backup?). Hit probability reduced by 60%.Target is missile with pop-up terminal manouver - hit probability reduced by 25%Final Ph: 1% Result: 55 - MISS.
- PhD.png (47.5 KiB) Viewed 189 times
Are there also hidden penalties?
Re: 1892 Phalanx to ineffective?
Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2026 9:14 pm
by DWReese
Every one of my Phalanx results are now only 1 percent.
Re: 1892 Phalanx to ineffective?
Posted: Fri Jul 31, 2026 7:15 am
by blu3s
Thanks for the report, logged 0017443
Re: [LOGGED] 1892 Phalanx to ineffective?
Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2026 11:42 am
by Dimitris
There was a problem related to LOS checks which resulted to the Phalanx mount never being able to use its FCR against the targets (this affects all similar systems, not just the Phalanx). This has been fixed for the next update release.