Help wanted for long Japanese campaign
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:56 pm
Hi everyone!
I would like to create a Japanese Campaign consisting of many small, quick-to-play scenarios.
The core force would consist of one Infantry Platoon A*, that means:
A0 Japanese HQ
B0 Japanese Plt HQ
B1 Inf Platoon A*
B2 Inf Platoon A*
B3 Inf Platoon A*
The scenarios would be very small and quick to play.
Sometimes there would be no aux units (so that only the 5 units of the core force have to fullfill the mission), most times there would be auxiliary units.
The battles would be somewhere between the size of the smaller MCSE/MCWT-scenarios and real mini-scenarios (like M4's incredible 8X8-Koenigstiger scenario).
If several people merge together, we should be able to create the campaign within a few months.
The current state is:
I have created a raw version of 6 scenarios picturing Mongolian/Manchkuoan border clashes in May/July 1939 (that would be the foreplay for Nomonhan).
This campaign is placed in Slot 33 and the zipped file has a size of 118 K.
Normally, I would continue to make another 4 or so scenarios representing Nomonhan, then asking for some playtesters, refining the campaign and would be finished.
However, if some other authors would join, we could create a japanese campaign of many small scenarios that would allow the player to lead a japanese infantry platoon from 1939 - 1945.
It would be a semi-historical campaign that would be fast&fun to play.
The Nomonhan clashes rougly represent actions of the IJA 23rd Inf. Division. This Divison was statuioned in Manchuria until 1944 when it was redeployed to the Phillipines where it was destroyed.
For a nice campaign, we should take the liberty to use the infantry platoon at the more interesting places.
I could imagine (suggestion):
1940-late 1941: China, Oppoents: Nat. Chinese, Com. Chinese
late 1941/early 1942: Philipines, opponents: Philipinos, USArmy, USMC
Aug. 42 - Feb 43: Guadalcanal, Opponents: USMC, USArmy
March 43 - Sept 1944: ? (It would be nice to have somne scenarios with UK and Australian opponents)
Oct 1944-Dec 1944: Leyte
Jan 45-Aug. 1945: Luzon
Hypothetical scenarios could be:
Midway June 42 (Invasion goes on despite carrier losses)
Comando actions with submarine transport against any allied location
We could do this either with one coordinator for everything (finding playtesters e.t.c.) - this sounds a little difficult.
Or we could declare the mainstream here (from date to date at location xyz) and one author would be responsible for that timeframe and coordinate everything within that timeframe - he would ask for playtesters e.t.c..
What do you think?
Is there anyone out there who would be interested to participate as author or as playtester?
I suggest that everyone who is interested posts within this thread.
If there is no one who would participate in this effort, I will finish that campaign with Nomonhan - it would be a Mini-Campaign consisting of 9-10 small scenarios.
The scenarios are very small, so it should be possible to create one sceanrio/weekend and to refine it on another weekend or so.
I would like to create a Japanese Campaign consisting of many small, quick-to-play scenarios.
The core force would consist of one Infantry Platoon A*, that means:
A0 Japanese HQ
B0 Japanese Plt HQ
B1 Inf Platoon A*
B2 Inf Platoon A*
B3 Inf Platoon A*
The scenarios would be very small and quick to play.
Sometimes there would be no aux units (so that only the 5 units of the core force have to fullfill the mission), most times there would be auxiliary units.
The battles would be somewhere between the size of the smaller MCSE/MCWT-scenarios and real mini-scenarios (like M4's incredible 8X8-Koenigstiger scenario).
If several people merge together, we should be able to create the campaign within a few months.
The current state is:
I have created a raw version of 6 scenarios picturing Mongolian/Manchkuoan border clashes in May/July 1939 (that would be the foreplay for Nomonhan).
This campaign is placed in Slot 33 and the zipped file has a size of 118 K.
Normally, I would continue to make another 4 or so scenarios representing Nomonhan, then asking for some playtesters, refining the campaign and would be finished.
However, if some other authors would join, we could create a japanese campaign of many small scenarios that would allow the player to lead a japanese infantry platoon from 1939 - 1945.
It would be a semi-historical campaign that would be fast&fun to play.
The Nomonhan clashes rougly represent actions of the IJA 23rd Inf. Division. This Divison was statuioned in Manchuria until 1944 when it was redeployed to the Phillipines where it was destroyed.
For a nice campaign, we should take the liberty to use the infantry platoon at the more interesting places.
I could imagine (suggestion):
1940-late 1941: China, Oppoents: Nat. Chinese, Com. Chinese
late 1941/early 1942: Philipines, opponents: Philipinos, USArmy, USMC
Aug. 42 - Feb 43: Guadalcanal, Opponents: USMC, USArmy
March 43 - Sept 1944: ? (It would be nice to have somne scenarios with UK and Australian opponents)
Oct 1944-Dec 1944: Leyte
Jan 45-Aug. 1945: Luzon
Hypothetical scenarios could be:
Midway June 42 (Invasion goes on despite carrier losses)
Comando actions with submarine transport against any allied location
We could do this either with one coordinator for everything (finding playtesters e.t.c.) - this sounds a little difficult.
Or we could declare the mainstream here (from date to date at location xyz) and one author would be responsible for that timeframe and coordinate everything within that timeframe - he would ask for playtesters e.t.c..
What do you think?
Is there anyone out there who would be interested to participate as author or as playtester?
I suggest that everyone who is interested posts within this thread.
If there is no one who would participate in this effort, I will finish that campaign with Nomonhan - it would be a Mini-Campaign consisting of 9-10 small scenarios.
The scenarios are very small, so it should be possible to create one sceanrio/weekend and to refine it on another weekend or so.
, but some feedback at this point would be helpfull for me. (I remember the invaluable feedback I received with my Czech campaign - again thanks to all who playtested it and posted their critics [&o]).