Page 1 of 1
Breakthrough in Allied Sigint again...is this really fair?
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2004 10:11 pm
by Hortlund
SIG INT REPORT FOR 02/26/42
Radio transmissions detected at Tokyo.
RE: Breakthrough in Allied Sigint again...is this really fair?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2004 12:46 am
by Brady
Who is the Girl in your avatar pic?
RE: Breakthrough in Allied Sigint again...is this really fair?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2004 12:54 am
by Tankerace
and is she available? [:D]
RE: Breakthrough in Allied Sigint again...is this really fair?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2004 1:23 am
by Synjin
Looks a bit like Natalie Portman... the Star Wars I & II queen Amadala chic...
And yes. Hot.
RE: Breakthrough in Allied Sigint again...is this really fair?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2004 1:34 am
by byron13
It's more fair than the "Radio transmissions from Prince Rupert" or other allied-held cities.
RE: Breakthrough in Allied Sigint again...is this really fair?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2004 2:11 am
by Rob322
ORIGINAL: Panzerjaeger Hortlund
SIG INT REPORT FOR 02/26/42
Radio transmissions detected at Tokyo.
Sure it's fair, some of the radio transmissions made by Japanese pilots over Pearl Harbor were picked up in Japan.
Allied Intel was good, a major component of our victory (in both the Pacific and Europe) was the ability to read our opponents' mail.
RE: Breakthrough in Allied Sigint again...is this really fair?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2004 2:58 am
by von Murrin
ORIGINAL: Rob322
ORIGINAL: Panzerjaeger Hortlund
SIG INT REPORT FOR 02/26/42
Radio transmissions detected at Tokyo.
Sure it's fair, some of the radio transmissions made by Japanese pilots over Pearl Harbor were picked up in Japan.
Allied Intel was good, a major component of our victory (in both the Pacific and Europe) was the ability to read our opponents' mail.
PJ is using sarcasm. Appropriately read, it becomes "Is this necessary?".[;)]