Page 1 of 1
PC Gamer Review
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 1:15 am
by JosephL
Wow two in one day? I'm on a roll
Starshatter appeared in PC Gamer this month and snagged a nice 74%. Compared to NRA Hunter which got a 07% (possibly the lowest score I have ever seen in PCG) that's not bad.
My favorite line from this puppy is:
"There's enough replay value here to satiate even the most voracious Luke Skywalker wanna-bes."
Maybe I like it because he used the word vocacious... maybe I like it because I never saw a journlaist write wanna-bes... either way you can read the full article in the March edition of PCgamer.
-Joe
RE: PC Gamer Review
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:44 am
by DamoclesX
HEHEHE
7%
BAHHAHA I love it.
RE: PC Gamer Review
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:28 am
by Diabolico
Looking good![8D]
=S=
RE: PC Gamer Review
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 9:35 am
by TheDeadlyShoe
is it just me or does PC gamer keep getting more and more ahead of schedule
RE: PC Gamer Review
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:07 am
by Sky_walker
74% - only....
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
RE: PC Gamer Review
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 3:54 am
by Psirat
ORIGINAL: Sky_walker
74% - only....
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Yeah, that was my thought, too.
74%? [:-] Tsk...
I'd give it at least a B+; I'd even bump it up to an A when you consider how moddable it is. I'll be playing this one for years.
[:D]
RE: PC Gamer Review
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 5:58 am
by John DiCamillo
They're probably just leaving room for a better score on the sequel. [;)]
RE: PC Gamer Review
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 2:33 pm
by Jarhead0331
ORIGINAL: DamoclesX
HEHEHE
7%
BAHHAHA I love it.
NRA Hunter only got such poor reviews because the reviewers are a bunch liberal anti-gun pansies! That and because the game really sucks...
RE: PC Gamer Review
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 3:40 pm
by Jumppoint
ORIGINAL: John DiCamillo
They're probably just leaving room for a better score on the sequel. [;)]
Does that mean there will be an offical sequel?
RE: PC Gamer Review
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 4:52 pm
by Incendiary Lemon
ORIGINAL: Jarhead0331
That and because the game really sucks...
own up, you bought it didn't you.
RE: PC Gamer Review
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 5:58 pm
by Pheagey
Yeah, that was my thought, too.
74%? [:-] Tsk...
I'd give it at least a B+; I'd even bump it up to an A when you consider how moddable it is. I'll be playing this one for years.
[:D]
Yea, I have been. Like 4 1/2 years now.
@milo: True. After seeing how your run things each release is not more of the same but always better than the last.
RE: PC Gamer Review
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 7:16 pm
by Pheonix Starflare
ORIGINAL: Jumppoint
Does that mean there will be an offical sequel?
What? You thought we'd ever let milo stop working on SS?
RE: PC Gamer Review
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 1:42 am
by Jumppoint
ORIGINAL: Pheonix Starflare
What? You thought we'd ever let milo stop working on SS?
True, I have been lurking for about two years before the game was published. I am figuring if there is a sequel the story will move forword, and maybe some new ships and maybe features.
RE: PC Gamer Review
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 10:39 am
by Kuokkanen
ORIGINAL: Jumppoint
ORIGINAL: John DiCamillo
They're probably just leaving room for a better score on the sequel. [;)]
Does that mean there will be an offical sequel?
Take a look to topic
Geez, I'm tired...