Page 1 of 1
tentative suggestion
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 9:30 pm
by themattcurtis
Does anyone think it might be worthwhile to include a feature wherein a platoon or company or whatever could be detached from its normal Chain of Command and attached to another unit? For example, take a platoon of infantry from its company and attach it to a tank company? Said infantry wouldn't suffer any penalties for distance from its original HQ, but maybe there could be a slight delay in processing orders issued to it? It'd allow for the formation of adhoc units.
RE: tentative suggestion
Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2005 11:16 pm
by Jarhead0331
Great idea! If infantry was in the game, that is...I think once the devs model infantry, your idea will be implemented...
RE: tentative suggestion
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 1:02 am
by themattcurtis
No. I don't wanna take things in that direction.
Infantry are already in the game (I got a copy, and I understand the abstract representation).
I don't care if they have their own counters, personally. If they're represented by a Marder IFV, Bradley, or whatever, mech infantry units are mech infantry units.
What I want is to have a company of tanks, and detach a platoon of IFVs from their parent unit so they can be tacked on to the MBT command.
RE: tentative suggestion
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 2:57 am
by Jarhead0331
It was your example pal...
RE: tentative suggestion
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 1:10 pm
by themattcurtis
Y'know, don't "pal" me. I wasn't being contentious with you. I wasn't pickin a fight. I was just clarifying a point.
"Pal...."
RE: tentative suggestion
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 3:45 pm
by Jarhead0331
Look...I've been making great progress in my anger management classes, but you and that douchebag I saw on the road this morning with the upside down american flag bumper sticker are really on the verge of destroying all my hard work...
So do me a favor, would ya?
My original reply wasn't meant as a shot anyway...I was merely responding to what you posted which was specifically directed at infantry...next time, be more clear then...what do you want me to say?
RE: tentative suggestion
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:05 pm
by themattcurtis
Yer a charmer. Think you've said enough, but keep going. So far, you've gotten condescending, compared me to some guy with an anti-american bumper sticker and alluded I'm a douchebag. All over a post related to a game. Meanwhile, don't see anything I've said that's reason to get all steamed.
Yeesh [8|]
RE: tentative suggestion
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 4:57 pm
by Jarhead0331
Charmer? the ladies seem to think so...
RE: tentative suggestion
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:08 pm
by themattcurtis
Point being is that my first response was to keep this thing on track. There are gamers here who have driven across their point about the representation of infantry. I didn't want the thread to go there, so there shouldn't have been a problem with my saying so. Didn't need to be any clearer than the original post because Infantry IS here. Just not the way some people want
If yer angy, oh well. This is the first I've even come to having a fight on the board, and I can't make myself care [:)]
Not angry...not upset...just confused about how it got to name calling. Whether or not yer going to agree, coming in and "palling" someone comes across as pissy.
Dunno. In real life you might be a hell of a guy. So I'm gonna end it here. Take it easy.
Matt
RE: tentative suggestion
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:38 pm
by Jarhead0331
Actually, in real life (as opposed to fake life here on the boards) I'm an a$$hole. But I've got one hell of a sense of humor...
RE: tentative suggestion
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2005 6:56 pm
by Marc von Martial
Guys, really. Stop it.