Page 1 of 1
Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:26 pm
by Brady
???
RE: Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:33 pm
by Terminus
Well, it's British... A Lancaster?
RE: Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:35 pm
by oi_you_nutter
its British ?
i cannot see a mug of tea anywhere in the photo
RE: Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:36 pm
by Terminus
I was looking at the hats and the design of the oxygen mask.
RE: Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 12:15 am
by RBWhite
I agree, all that bullet proof or plexi-glass, and the multi leveled cockpit.
RE: Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 12:33 am
by RBWhite
Passing thought. How much differance is there between the Lancaster, the Manchester B and the Handley Page Halifax B
RE: Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:10 am
by Brigz
Looks post WWII to me. Is it an early Canberra?
RE: Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 7:20 am
by ilovestrategy
I'm curious, what are each of them doing taskwise?
RE: Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:49 am
by RBWhite
Canberra would have been to small, I think.
Interior construction does suggest WWII or soon there after.
Canope was also a dome on the Canberra.
RE: Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 12:03 pm
by Terminus
If you look at the canopies of the Lancaster, Mosquito and Canberra, they're all pretty similar. The Mossie had only two crewmembers, however, as did the Canberra, so I'm going to stick with the Lanc.
RE: Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:21 pm
by Brigz
ORIGINAL: Terminus
If you look at the canopies of the Lancaster, Mosquito and Canberra, they're all pretty similar. The Mossie had only two crewmembers, however, as did the Canberra, so I'm going to stick with the Lanc.
The Canberra B.2 (1950) had three crew members. Later versions with the "B-47" type canopy had two crew members, including the US versions.
RE: Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 4:24 pm
by Terminus
Hmm, interesting, considering that the data reference I was looking at before I made the above post was FOR the B. Mk 2.
VERY interesting. I looked at another book of mine which quoted the B. Mk 2 as having a three-man crew.
RE: Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 5:30 pm
by Terminus
Don't think so. There doesn't seem to be a visible wing above the canopy in the background.
RE: Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 5:30 pm
by oi_you_nutter
i agree that the Canberra is too small for that amount of interior space
what about a Shorts Sunderland ?
RE: Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 6:05 pm
by Cap Mandrake
If that is the pilot at top, then the thing must have windows to the right and below the cockpit...as the pilot clearly appears to be looking at something.
RE: Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 6:05 pm
by Terminus
The photographer, perhaps?
RE: Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 6:09 pm
by Cap Mandrake
It seems way to wide to be a Lancaster..look at the gap between the pilot and the airframe. Perhaps a search aircraft.
RE: Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 9:21 pm
by RBWhite
Just A guess
Lancaster
Top Turret gunner
Co-Pilot or Pilot
Bombardier/Front turret gunner
RE: Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:54 pm
by RBWhite
Let me try guess #2
If not a Short Sunderland, how about a Short Shetland
RE: Name This Unlimited...(61)
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:57 pm
by Brady
It is, Halifax.