Page 1 of 1
Do 5 person games qualify?
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 11:29 pm
by Daykeras
Um... Subject... yea.
What's answer?
RE: Do 5 person games qualify?
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 3:27 am
by JanSorensen
Sure, if someone is willing to play China only - and the others dont mind the extra delay in the game - then I dont see a problem.
Why anyone would want to is beyond me - but thats not for me to judge

RE: Do 5 person games qualify?
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 4:47 am
by Daykeras
Well I'm just saying since that's 3 v 2, even if 1 of the 3 IS china
Awesomeness.
RE: Do 5 person games qualify?
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:15 am
by a511
of course im not saying that CHN can be a standalone superpower, and invade tokyo. but CHN, if takes lightly by JP and with allied's LL, can be a real threat to JP's colonies in CHN, esp after US's DOW. [:-]
but i agree with Jan that the addtional delay btn turns will make the game really slow.
AN
RE: Do 5 person games qualify?
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 10:21 pm
by Uncle Josef
I don't really think there's any problem with five player games.
Sure it may take a little longer cos you have to wait for the China player to take his turn and then send the file on to WA player, but I find that all turns as China go by relatively quick anyhow.
Plus China is a good separate side to play as if you don't wanna use the 'overpowered' WA or Soviet Union.
So does anybody want a 4/5 player game?
