To Tordenskjold
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 7:56 am
I saw you wrote this...[8D]
Would agree to everything but Allied DC.....[:-]
If you have interest you can get me at [;)]
jeff@sports-j.net[&o]
Hello, would like to play against you as Japs. Only played 15 rounds against a human oponent and thus have limited experience. Scenario 17 is good and long. Have been advised from more experienced players the following "house rules"
Jap naval commitment 160% (Gives the japs one more carrier during campaign if I got it right)
Reinforcements-Varable
Allied repair advantage-Off
Jap sub docrine-On (historical correct)
Thats it I think, yes and only use carrier squadrons on carriers, not landbased. This is also historical correct since special training is needed to land on a carrier deck.
Scenario 17 is fine. If I am Jap I start. Ok by you?
Tordenskjold
Would agree to everything but Allied DC.....[:-]
If you have interest you can get me at [;)]
jeff@sports-j.net[&o]
Hello, would like to play against you as Japs. Only played 15 rounds against a human oponent and thus have limited experience. Scenario 17 is good and long. Have been advised from more experienced players the following "house rules"
Jap naval commitment 160% (Gives the japs one more carrier during campaign if I got it right)
Reinforcements-Varable
Allied repair advantage-Off
Jap sub docrine-On (historical correct)
Thats it I think, yes and only use carrier squadrons on carriers, not landbased. This is also historical correct since special training is needed to land on a carrier deck.
Scenario 17 is fine. If I am Jap I start. Ok by you?
Tordenskjold