Page 1 of 2
Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:54 pm
by grraven2004
Being from the Pacific Northwest I have to say...
Go Seahawks!!!
RE: Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 8:57 pm
by KDonovan
living in PA..i gotta say
GO STEELERS!!
[:D]
RE: Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:13 pm
by ctangus
Being somewhat delusional, I have to say:
GO BROWNS! [:D]
RE: Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:16 pm
by Terminus
GO AWAY!!!
RE: Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:17 pm
by Titanwarrior89
Ill watch the superbowl. But i am more of a college fan. At least they don't pack up and leave town. "GO Steelers"[:D]
RE: Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:32 pm
by Ron Saueracker
Saints baby!
RE: Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 9:40 pm
by Drex
Being on the Left Coast, go Seahawks!
RE: Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 10:32 pm
by Oliver Heindorf
Patriots !
uh-oh, I missed the show [:D]
Seahawks of course !
PS TV-coverage is here without commercial spots [:D]
RE: Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 10:54 pm
by acmejeff
I live an hour north of Seattle, GO HAWKS
RE: Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:14 pm
by GaryChildress
ORIGINAL: Terminus
GO AWAY!!!
[:D] If it doesn't show up on a computer screen, then I'm not watching it.
RE: Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 12:34 am
by witpqs
I'm rooting for WITP 2. Go Mike Wood!
RE: Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:19 am
by Nomad
I just wish the damn game would end and someone would send me a turn. [:(][:'(]
RE: Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 5:31 am
by scott64
RE: Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:48 pm
by Bradley7735
Yeah, the commercials were lame. But, not as lame as the officiating. Hmm... I'm pretty convinced that professional sports are all just fancy versions of professional wrestling.
(for those of you who don't know what professional wresting is, it is a type of entertainment where the matches are all predecided on who will win.)
RE: Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:05 pm
by Nikademus
gotta agree there. The officiating was atrocious....almost fit for yet one more conspiracy thread. [:@]
RE: Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:12 pm
by rtrapasso
ORIGINAL: Nikademus
gotta agree there. The officiating was atrocious....almost fit for yet one more conspiracy thread. [:@]
i had a friend who was kind of a sports nut until he got a VCR and started looking at the refs calls. He became convinced that gamblers were no longer bribing the players to throw games, but they were bribing the refs. The refs, of course, are not under the scrutiny of the press, etc. like the players are, and they don't get anywhere near the money the players do.
He stopped watching sports after that...
RE: Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Mon Feb 06, 2006 3:17 pm
by Terminus
Why would it be surprising that the umpires were bad?
RE: Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:39 am
by witpqs
ORIGINAL: Bradley7735
for those of you who don't know what professional wresting is, it is a type of entertainment where the matches are all predecided on who will win.
NO! NO! You Lie! Say it ain't so!
[:D]
RE: Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:40 am
by grraven2004
Well the Seahawks 12th man was no match for Pittsburghs 18 [:@][:(]
RE: Super Bowl Prognostication
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 1:39 pm
by rtrapasso
ORIGINAL: Terminus
Why would it be surprising that the umpires were bad?
It isn't if you accept my friend's "gamblers are bribing the refs" theory.
However, supposedly the best refs are supposed to be used at this event, and they have advantage of using TV cameras to make calls in close plays (although since i no longer watch football, i will admit i don't know what the National Football League's current policy in this matter is...) so bad officiating is not really acceptable.