Page 1 of 1

NikMod errata list

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2006 3:20 pm
by Nikademus
I'm collecting information on boo boos for the next release version. Stuff collected so far listed below. If any users have found other boo boos, (such as inconsistancies between scn's 40 and 45, please list them here. I'll modify the list as I go.

****

1. scenario#45 (42A may start)

Location ID: 136 (7th Air Force) - no location set at start of scenario
Location ID: 137 (10th Air Force) - no location set at start of scenario
Location ID: 138 (11th Air Force) - no location set at start of scenario
Location ID: 145 (223 Group RAF) - no location set at start of scenario
Location ID: 146 (224 Group RAF) - no location set at start of scenario
Location ID: 147 (225 Group RAF) - no location set at start of scenario
Location ID: 159 (US III Corps) - no location set at start of scenario
Location ID: 160 (US IX Corps) - no location set at start of scenario

2. Verify availability of latewar models:

P-51B
B7A Grace

3. The Spitfire Vc's are also in error....they begin deployment in 11/43, not 7/43 The Oz Spit Vb/c squadrons deploy in 42. I suppose.....I can find a slot for them and give a very limited production (something like 5 a month)

4. 42A (Scenario 45) the replacement rate for the Boomerang is 140

5. Kittyhawk MVR out of sync with P40E

6. The mine dispenser of the class O19 is in the wrong slot in scenario #40. Correction:
The class is correct, but the ships (O19 O20) themselves are wrong. They just need to be refreshed.

7 Scn 45 - duplicate AVG's (AVG and 23rd FG)

8. Beufort/Beufighter.

9. China ENG bases (radar)


RE: NikMod errata list

Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:31 pm
by ckk
Nik

Remember the Boomerang replacement rate[;)]

RE: NikMod errata list

Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:37 pm
by Nikademus
refresh my memory. Its not what it used to me.

Image

RE: NikMod errata list

Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:43 pm
by ckk
At least in 42A the replacement rate for the Boomerang is 240[&:]

RE: NikMod errata list

Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:55 pm
by Nikademus
ah yes. thx

keep em coming


RE: NikMod errata list

Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:58 pm
by ckk
No problema You know I will[:D]

RE: NikMod errata list

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:30 am
by michaelm75au
The mine dispenser of the class O19 is in the wrong slot in scenario #40.

The mine dispenser must be in slot #2 for mine replenishment/loading to work.
It is correct in scenario #45.

This was a change made in 1.6 when minelaying subs were fixed. The Dutch class had the mine dispenser in the wrong slot and it was corrected then.

Correction:
The class is correct, but the ships (O19 O20) themselves are wrong. They just need to be refreshed.

RE: NikMod errata list

Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 5:31 am
by Nikademus
bump for me

RE: NikMod errata list

Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 7:40 am
by JeffroK
ORIGINAL: ckk

At least in 42A the replacement rate for the Boomerang is 240[&:]

Does this problem keep coming back ??[8D]

RE: NikMod errata list

Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 1:22 pm
by Nikademus
apparantly....we should have went with WPK instead of WPO....

(War Plan Kangeroo)

build a fence around Oz....no threat of invasion....no Spitfires....no Beuforts....no Beufighters....no Boomerangs.....ah....peace for the modder...... [:D]

RE: NikMod errata list

Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 11:10 pm
by JeffroK
ORIGINAL: Nikademus

apparantly....we should have went with WPK instead of WPO....

(War Plan Kangeroo)

build a fence around Oz....no threat of invasion....no Spitfires....no Beauforts....no Beaufighters....no Boomerangs.....ah....peace for the modder...... [:D]

WE got a Dingo fence, a Rabbit fence, why not a Jap Fence to keep them out, or at least in Queensland.