New Finnish home rule
Posted: Sun Mar 26, 2006 7:11 pm
1. All Finnish armed forces must be within finnish korpses. All finnish korpses must be attached to “Karelian Fin Army” HQ. All finnish airgroups (A.R.) must stay with “Karelian Fin Army” HQ.
2. Only German forces can be added to Finnish korps. No more than 3 Infantry divisions can be attached to Finnish forces at the same time. A Finnish korps must have at least one Finnish division in it.
3. Finnish forces cannot attack (but can bombard) Leningrad (40;7), it’s supply hex (41;6) or hex (40;6). The Soviet player has to garrison hex (40;6) with minimum 5 division sized units after September the 1 of 1941.
4. Finnish forses can be transferred in to Soviet territory only via Tallinn port and must remain on or above 12 parallel. “Karelian Fin Army” must have a direct land path to Helsinki.
This rule is designed to reflect political issues of Finnish participation in the war on one side. On the other side, the ability to transfer a significant number of Finns into mainland Russia (which is a bit ahistorical) can lead to a more historical situation around Leningrad:
Finns can more easily defend against Soviet winter offense which can lead to a prolonged siege of Leningrad. The capture of Leningrad would be a German option for 1942.
What do you think?
P.S. Grammar corrections would be highly appriciated.
2. Only German forces can be added to Finnish korps. No more than 3 Infantry divisions can be attached to Finnish forces at the same time. A Finnish korps must have at least one Finnish division in it.
3. Finnish forces cannot attack (but can bombard) Leningrad (40;7), it’s supply hex (41;6) or hex (40;6). The Soviet player has to garrison hex (40;6) with minimum 5 division sized units after September the 1 of 1941.
4. Finnish forses can be transferred in to Soviet territory only via Tallinn port and must remain on or above 12 parallel. “Karelian Fin Army” must have a direct land path to Helsinki.
This rule is designed to reflect political issues of Finnish participation in the war on one side. On the other side, the ability to transfer a significant number of Finns into mainland Russia (which is a bit ahistorical) can lead to a more historical situation around Leningrad:
Finns can more easily defend against Soviet winter offense which can lead to a prolonged siege of Leningrad. The capture of Leningrad would be a German option for 1942.
What do you think?
P.S. Grammar corrections would be highly appriciated.