Cavalry Corps
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:50 pm
Historically, there were some units of cavalry attached to Corps, but there were also Corps composed completely of cavalry and horse artillery.
In CoG terms, has anyone found a strategic or tactical reason to do this?
I've done it just to simulate real OOBs, but have seen no advantage in doing so.
I tend to stick with the concept that a corps should be a well rounded balanced force of arms, so I usually have balanced corps with Inf, Cav, and Art....with the bulk being Inf.
The only thing in CoG terms that I could see potentially making this worthwile is if a general's bonus to cavalry charge were applicable to all units in his command, not just the unit he were attached to in a Tactical Battle.
Perhaps have a Corps of Cavalry would give it a higher Initiative in strategic movement, allowing you to get somewhere before the enemy does & therefore being the defender?
In CoG terms, has anyone found a strategic or tactical reason to do this?
I've done it just to simulate real OOBs, but have seen no advantage in doing so.
I tend to stick with the concept that a corps should be a well rounded balanced force of arms, so I usually have balanced corps with Inf, Cav, and Art....with the bulk being Inf.
The only thing in CoG terms that I could see potentially making this worthwile is if a general's bonus to cavalry charge were applicable to all units in his command, not just the unit he were attached to in a Tactical Battle.
Perhaps have a Corps of Cavalry would give it a higher Initiative in strategic movement, allowing you to get somewhere before the enemy does & therefore being the defender?