Matrix Games Forums

Hi!
Sorry for the off topic, but does anyone knows if the wreck of the HMAS Sydney have been explored? Are there any new details about her mysterios destruction?

Not much mystery to it; the two ships killed each other...

As for either wreck (the Sydney or the Kormoran) they've never been found.

well, the mistery is there are no survivors. They couldn't all die! The fire from Kormoran couldn't kill everybody onboard...

Why not? Eyewitnesses on the Kormoran reported loud explosions consistent with magazines going off. Besides, they were far from land, so any initial survivors could easily have perished in the water. There were three survivors off the Hood...

Haven't read anything about magazine explosions? The Kormoran crew tracked Sydney as she drifted away, and reported it burning in the distance until after midnight...

The Kormoran was drifting as well. Basically, the two ships drifted apart, and the Kormoran lost contact with the Sydney in mist. Flashes and sounds consistent with large explosions were then seen and heard on the Kormoran. I say it's perfectly possible; the Kormoran has 6*6-inch guns to the Sydney's 8, and had surprise on their side, so they got first blows.

I'm a great fan of Kormoran as well as other raiders, but... something is just wrong in this story. Yes, both the sydney and kormoran vere badly damaged and were drifting out of control. Yet, crew of Kormoran managed to abandon the ship and most of them survived. Sydney had better armor protection and (I assume) damage control. Magaziones were probably flooded by that time (3 hours or more after the battle). If the situation aboard was so hopeless, they would abandon the ship well before the explosions (just like the Kormoran crew did). And, that's why this is weird. What do you think about theory that Japanese I-boat finished off Sydney?

I think it's pretty standard conspiracy theory claptrap, concocted by people who simply couldn't believe the confluence of circumstances: that an experienced RAN captain brought his ship basically alongside an uidentified ship in wartime, that an armed (albeit heavily armed) merchant ship finished off a light cruiser, and that there were no survivors.

Another aspect is that the Kormoran blew away the Sydney's bridge almost immediately, presumably killing the entire command echelon of the ship. Also, if the fires were not under control, or only seemingly under control, they still could have reached the Sydney's magazines.

And finally, even if there were survivors from the Sydney, nobody on their side knew where they were. They could very easily have died of exposure. All that's ever been found was a Carley raft. Look at the Indianapolis. Hundreds of survivors perished in the water, lots of them by shark attack, even though a very large percentage of the ship's company escaped her when she sank.

The OZ Govt has committed some funds to the search for Sydney, but the possible area is pretty huge so we'll wait to see.

I think a lot of the conspiracy theories have been debunked, but I still think something odd happened!

Well, something was very wrong with the whole procedure of closing two of the ships too much!
And BTW wasn't Sydney CA, not CL? CLs usually didn't carried 8" guns.

ORIGINAL: zuikaku

Well, something was very wrong with the whole procedure of closing two of the ships too much!
And BTW wasn't Sydney CA, not CL? CLs usually didn't carried 8" guns.

Yes,

but just off the Australian Coast wasnt the Denmark straits so thinngs may have been off high alert. Plus the Chatham Cl was built for Europe and got pretty hot, of NW OZ could be 100+ at that time of year so maybe she wasnt closed down fully.

The Sydney only had 6" guns

ORIGINAL: JeffK

Yes,

but just off the Australian Coast wasnt the Denmark straits so thinngs may have been off high alert. Plus the Chatham Cl was built for Europe and got pretty hot, of NW OZ could be 100+ at that time of year so maybe she wasnt closed down fully.

The Sydney only had 6" guns

or maybe they were just a bit overconfident after successfull mediteranean campaign? But it seems that gun turrets were not manned at all! I cannot understand that. and that don't explain one thing... why most of the Kormoran's crew survived? Both ships sunked in approx same area in same time. But one crew survived and the other just perished? How could 60 years pass without any serious investigation?

The Sydney was a modified Leander class light cruiser with 4*2 6-inch guns. There have been more than a few investigations, but nothing has ever been proven to people's satisfaction. Nobody seems to want to believe the only witnesses, those naughty Germans.

http://warships.web4u.cz/lode.php?langu ... nder+modif.

I think nothing wouldn't be odd in the story if Sydney exploded instantly after beeing fired upon. I believe the crew of the Kormoran, but just have this feeling that something is wrong with this event.
BTW, I'm not an Aussie [:)] Maybe their fan, but not an Aussie (but on the other hand I'm also fan of the Kriegsmarine and IJN)... So, I consider myself objective regarding this event

ORIGINAL: Terminus

http://warships.web4u.cz/lode.php?langu ... nder+modif.

152mm is 6" not the 8", but this has no impact on her fate...

There is such a thing as a fire that you think you've put out, but haven't. On a warship full of ammunition and fuel, that's many times more dangerous than on land. Plus, with (presumably) most of the senior officers dead on the bridge...

The Kormoran's crew estimated that they inflicted around 1,000 hits on the Sidney with their primary and secondary batteries, as well as their anti-aircraft guns, plus a torpedo hit for good measure. The Sydney got in four hits on the Kormoran in return, all of them 6-inch.

ORIGINAL: Terminus
light cruiser with 4*2 8-inch guns

Could you repeat that???

Yes, as I said 4*2 6-inch guns...

Typo...[;)]