Page 1 of 1

Elefant/Ferdinand in WIR

Posted: Thu May 10, 2001 4:00 am
by Yogi Yohan
I think the Elefant (aka Ferdinand) is not correctly represented in WIR. There were just 90 built, and they were conversions of the rejected Porsche Tiger design.

So, with no production line for Porsche Tigers running, no more Elefants could be made after those 90. But in WIR there's Elefant factories going in both the 1943 and 1944 scenarios. This is not historical, by the time of the Battle of Kursk all the Elefants that were going to be made had been made already, and all of them were used by the 9th Army in the northern pincer - with disastrous results, one might add.

IMHO the Elefant should be a "cost 99" unit that you cannot upgrade to and you cannot choose to produce. On the other hand, the 653rd and 654th JPz Batallions should come complete with 45 Elefants each.

Posted: Thu May 10, 2001 6:00 am
by Mist
Good idea, Yogi! If it is possible to create those two JPz batalions with enough Elephants in them and with correct arival data, then it is the thing that should be done. By the way, what you think about Soviet Su-76? They were "produced" on Pz-III chasis, so if there were not enough Pz-III captured, then Su-76 could not be produced in adequate numbers. I think that they must be removed from '41 scenario(to evade their unhistorical appearing) or replaced by something.

Posted: Thu May 10, 2001 6:49 am
by RickyB
Originally posted by Yogi Yohan:
I think the Elefant (aka Ferdinand) is not correctly represented in WIR. There were just 90 built, and they were conversions of the rejected Porsche Tiger design.

So, with no production line for Porsche Tigers running, no more Elefants could be made after those 90. But in WIR there's Elefant factories going in both the 1943 and 1944 scenarios. This is not historical, by the time of the Battle of Kursk all the Elefants that were going to be made had been made already, and all of them were used by the 9th Army in the northern pincer - with disastrous results, one might add.

IMHO the Elefant should be a "cost 99" unit that you cannot upgrade to and you cannot choose to produce. On the other hand, the 653rd and 654th JPz Batallions should come complete with 45 Elefants each.
Hi Yogi,

I just looked things over for these scenarios. I don't see an active Elefant factory in the 1943 scenario, and the 1944 the scenario itself shows one but it automatically converts in the Axis first turn to the Nashorn. No way of stopping that conversion but it probably should start out as the Nashorn in the first place. I don't see a problem with the factories otherwise, but I will make a change to the 44 campaign.

Sorry I didn't give the 653rd and 654th the full 45 apiece in 1943. I knew there were 90 but left a few out for maintenance or breakdowns. I can change it for the next release also.

As to the cost and making more, I understand what you are saying, but don't know if it is a worthwhile change. The game allows the player to control output for the other AFVs, so if he wants more Elefants, why not? As far as I have ever been able to tell, only the two battalions can use the Elefants, so extras won't allow other units to use them.

Let me know what you think! Thanks.

Posted: Thu May 10, 2001 7:28 am
by RickyB
Originally posted by Mist:
Good idea, Yogi! If it is possible to create those two JPz batalions with enough Elephants in them and with correct arival data, then it is the thing that should be done. By the way, what you think about Soviet Su-76? They were "produced" on Pz-III chasis, so if there were not enough Pz-III captured, then Su-76 could not be produced in adequate numbers. I think that they must be removed from '41 scenario(to evade their unhistorical appearing) or replaced by something.
Hey guys,

Question based on this post and Yogi's. I adjusted the 1943 scenario to include the Elefants, in almost the right numbers and in the right general location - north side of the Kursk bulge. However, these questions make me wonder if the updated scenario was included with the last update or not. I got my files through the development effort and they are my correct ones there, but I have not downloaded the last set from Matrix.

I will take a look at the Matrix files and make sure they are correct - if not, I will make sure the correct one are included in the next update and can send the correct ones to anyone who asks.

Mist - on the Su76, it was a mass produced vehicle based on various chassis. I do believe that there was a version based on captured German StuG IIIs, which had the PzKpfw III chassis, but here is a site that discusses the more normal SU76 in detail: http://history.vif2.ru/su76.html.

Posted: Thu May 10, 2001 1:11 pm
by Yogi Yohan
Originally posted by RickyB:
Hi Yogi,

I just looked things over for these scenarios. I don't see an active Elefant factory in the 1943 scenario, and the 1944 the scenario itself shows one but it automatically converts in the Axis first turn to the Nashorn. No way of stopping that conversion but it probably should start out as the Nashorn in the first place. I don't see a problem with the factories otherwise, but I will make a change to the 44 campaign.

Sorry I didn't give the 653rd and 654th the full 45 apiece in 1943. I knew there were 90 but left a few out for maintenance or breakdowns. I can change it for the next release also.

As to the cost and making more, I understand what you are saying, but don't know if it is a worthwhile change. The game allows the player to control output for the other AFVs, so if he wants more Elefants, why not? As far as I have ever been able to tell, only the two battalions can use the Elefants, so extras won't allow other units to use them.

Let me know what you think! Thanks.
You're right about the scenarios, I don't know where I got from the notion of an Elephant factory in 1943 scenario. Regarding the 653rd and 654th JPz batallions, they are close to real strenght in the -43 scenario, but I was thinking more of the -41 scenario, where they arrive at strenght 4. If you cannot build Elephants, they would have to arrive at full strenght.

What makes the Elephant different from other vehicles, and the reason I think it should not be available for further production is that it was a leftover from an abandoned project. The Germans could not have built any more Elephants, because they were building Henschel Tigers instead of Porsche Tigers. The two are mutually exclusive.

Posted: Thu May 10, 2001 7:14 pm
by RickyB
Originally posted by Yogi Yohan:
You're right about the scenarios, I don't know where I got from the notion of an Elephant factory in 1943 scenario. Regarding the 653rd and 654th JPz batallions, they are close to real strenght in the -43 scenario, but I was thinking more of the -41 scenario, where they arrive at strenght 4. If you cannot build Elephants, they would have to arrive at full strenght.

What makes the Elephant different from other vehicles, and the reason I think it should not be available for further production is that it was a leftover from an abandoned project. The Germans could not have built any more Elephants, because they were building Henschel Tigers instead of Porsche Tigers. The two are mutually exclusive.
For the 1941 campaign, the game is designed to fire up the one (I think that is it) Elefant factory at a very low level and then crank out the production until the Nashorn becomes avaailable at which point it will convert forever. I guess that taking the Elefant out of the AFV upgrade path and giving the two battalions their Elefants in full in early June should do the trick.

I welcome comments from everyone about this before I actually do anything with it. Thanks again for the ideas, Yogi.

Posted: Thu May 10, 2001 9:03 pm
by Yogi Yohan
Originally posted by RickyB:
For the 1941 campaign, the game is designed to fire up the one (I think that is it) Elefant factory at a very low level and then crank out the production until the Nashorn becomes avaailable at which point it will convert forever. I guess that taking the Elefant out of the AFV upgrade path and giving the two battalions their Elefants in full in early June should do the trick.

I welcome comments from everyone about this before I actually do anything with it. Thanks again for the ideas, Yogi.
No problem! Another reason why it would be better to just make the Elephant a Cost 99 unit is that if you play with Human Factory and upgrade control, then the lone Elefant factory will NOT convert of itself.

[ May 10, 2001: Message edited by: Yogi Yohan ]

Posted: Thu May 10, 2001 9:19 pm
by Mist
Yogi and all, what do you think about stats of Elephant? Knowing its battle results, I would not give him that BEST stats.

Posted: Thu May 10, 2001 9:26 pm
by Yogi Yohan
Originally posted by Mist:
Yogi and all, what do you think about stats of Elephant? Knowing its battle results, I would not give him that BEST stats.
The Elephant was a brute of a vehicle, but it was mishandled at Kursk. Without a mobile turret and secondary armament it should never have been used as a spearhead unit, but as long range Anti-Tank support.

The Germans tried to use it as a Tank, but in WIR its properly classified as a Heavy TD, causing it to only contribute half of its strenght to attacks. This makes the normal Tiger much better on the offensive in WIR.

On the defense, the Elephant would have been fearsome, with its massive armour and (at the time) unrivaled gun. I think the stats are fine as they are. (And the surviving Elephants were fitted with secondary armament after Kursk).

Posted: Sat May 12, 2001 7:44 am
by Hoth
(Originally posted by Mist) By the way, what you think about Soviet Su-76? They were "produced" on Pz-III chasis, so if there were not enough Pz-III captured, then Su-76 could not be produced in adequate numbers. I think that they must be removed from '41 scenario(to evade their unhistorical appearing) or replaced by something.
Learn something new everyday. :) I never knew that the SU-76 was built on captured Pz-III's. Thought it was built on the T-60 or T-70.

[ May 11, 2001: Message edited by: Hoth ]

[ May 11, 2001: Message edited by: Hoth ]

Posted: Sat May 12, 2001 9:19 am
by RickyB
Originally posted by Hoth:
Learn something new everyday. :) I never knew that the SU-76 was built on captured Pz-III's. Thought it was built on the T-60 or T-70.

[ May 11, 2001: Message edited by: Hoth ]

[ May 11, 2001: Message edited by: Hoth ]
You are right, Hoth. Something like 150 were built on captured Stug III/Pz III chassis, but around 14,000 were built on Soviet tank chassis, including at least the T60s.