Page 1 of 1
For &^(&'s sake, send more infantry!
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:34 am
by smope
I tried in vain to add/modify the Hoth scenario, Level 9.
How do you add a scenario?
Giving up, I modified scenario 8 instead.
In set battles, this is listed as "infantry skirmish 1942..."
Good luck Jerry, you'll need it.
may suffer from stability problems and long load times.
Level08-1.xml
RE: For &^(&'s sake, send more infantry!
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 11:55 am
by Erik Rutins
Smope,
Just make sure the id= is set to something different than the existing scenarios and save the xml file under a name that matches the id= field. The media= chooses the actual map.
Congrats on your first scenario! I'll give it a look. Note you can also now post .xml and .zip files as attachments in this sub-forum.
Regards,
- Erik
RE: For &^(&'s sake, send more infantry!
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 6:43 pm
by smope
ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins
Just make sure the id= is set to something different than the existing scenarios and save the xml file under a name that matches the id= field. The media= chooses the actual map.
i've tried that many different ways.
id="Level9-1"
id="Level09-1"
with file name
Level9-1.xml
or
Level09-1.xml
and adding/not adding it to en.xml
It never shows in the set battle list
i have attached the file
RE: For &^(&'s sake, send more infantry!
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:04 pm
by smope
ORIGINAL: smope
ORIGINAL: Erik Rutins
Just make sure the id= is set to something different than the existing scenarios and save the xml file under a name that matches the id= field. The media= chooses the actual map.
i've tried that many different ways.
id="Level9-1"
id="Level09-1"
with file name
Level9-1.xml
or
Level09-1.xml
and adding/not adding it to en.xml
It never shows in the set battle list
i have attached the file
for some reason, adding id="level7-1" works
RE: For &^(&'s sake, send more infantry!
Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 1:35 am
by Erik Rutins
I'll take a look at this when I'm back in the office, no idea off the top of my head why Level 9-1 would not have worked.
Regards,
- Erik