ORIGINAL: heliodorus04
ORIGINAL: wosung
ORIGINAL: heliodorus04
Totenkopf by Charles Trang - there's a gratutious 'I read history books too' reference for those who find them necessary)
http://www.amazon.com/Totenkopf-Charles ... 689&sr=1-4
Hardcover: 400 pages
"This detailed text is accompanied by an astonishing collection of some 800 photographs."
400 pages with 800 photos. Now this is a lot of reading history books too.
While I'm pleased that you could stop massaging Glanz's taint long enough to get both hands on a keyboard, the pleasure is over-ridden by the fact that you cannot understand sarcasm. Am I so a threat to whatever it is you stand for that you have to research the books I'm reading to find matter with which to impugn me, or are you simply jealous that I have row upon row of high-value and rare reading material about the war you claim to know so much about?
This is your intellectual counter to my arguments? Please. I have better reasoned bowel movements than that.
I know I was warned by mods to keep it civil, but these are the people you're allowing to bully. He doesn't like the book I cite, so he's going to call me an idiot. Why isn't he called out by name?
Prior to this post, I said nothing that could not be said in a peer review of a professorial thesis, including what I have said to Marquo. Wosung wants to call me names, then I should get to rebut similarly.
Didn't know the Trang book so I just checked it out. Based on Amazon's book data and based on the readers comments over there, some positive some negative, it seems to be basically a photo album.
How is that calling you names, or indicating I don’t like the Trang book or I don’t like photo albums?
Please feel free to discuss the forum policy with Eric Rutins.