Thunder in the East - GC41 NEE K62 (A) vs AtAtack (S)
Moderator: Joel Billings
T14 Stalingrad
Most of the Stalingrad pocket is reduced and a motorized korps is dispatched north to join with the 2nd army forces advancing on Saratov.
"Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views beyond the comprehension of the weak" - John Adams
T14 Astrakhan
Another motorized korps is dispatched towards Astrakhan. After cutting the last remaining rail line into the Caucasus it covers almost half the remaining distance to Astrakhan.
"Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views beyond the comprehension of the weak" - John Adams
T14 Maikop
The pocket around Krasnodar has held. Hube's XIV motorized korps continues its advance and seizes Maikop and Gelendzhik. The Crimean troops have launched Operation Bluecher crossing over the Kerch strait and securing the port at Temryuk.
"Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views beyond the comprehension of the weak" - John Adams
T14 losses and OOB
"Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views beyond the comprehension of the weak" - John Adams
Game conclusion
At this point my opponent has graciously conceded. It will be quite difficult for the Soviets to recover after the impending loss of all industry in Stalingrad and Gorky.
The Axis HWM is 831 VPs as of T14 and the following objective cities are also pocketed: Stalingrad (30 VPs), Krasnodar (10), Voronezh (10), Gorky (10), Yaroslavl (10). The weather prognosis for T15 is clear weather at all of these locations, and the expectation is for two more turns of light rain before the heavy mud arrives on T18. So it is not unreasonable to expect all of these objectives to be captured before the heavy rains, which would give a likely HWM of 931 VPs in '41.
Additionally Astrakhan (30VPs) seems a bit tough to defend for the Soviets. The Axis troops are within striking distance and the location is rather difficult to reinforce for the Soviets after the rail line got cut. It is also in the "arid steppes" climate that has clear weather until late November and a very low chance of blizzard. My intention was to keep attacking in this area even after switching to the defensive on the rest of the front.
As of mid-September, the Axis advance is close to the A-A line at most locations (Yaroslavl, Gorky, Saratov, Stalingrad, Astrakhan). I could probably get pretty close to Kazan too, but there's nothing in the Volga uplands that seems worth the front line extension.
The Axis losses from the summer campaign are relatively light overall. In terms of artillery, tanks and aircraft I actually have a bit more than on T1. On-map German manpower is 200k lower, but with 400k in pool that should not be hard to replace once the supply situation improves. (Granted, that may take until spring.) The Soviet losses are, in all likelihood, heavy enough to blunt any winter offensive.
I'd like to thank AtAtack for a hard fought game. Thanks to everyone else too, for reading through to the end of this AAR and for your thoughtful comments and questions!
The Axis HWM is 831 VPs as of T14 and the following objective cities are also pocketed: Stalingrad (30 VPs), Krasnodar (10), Voronezh (10), Gorky (10), Yaroslavl (10). The weather prognosis for T15 is clear weather at all of these locations, and the expectation is for two more turns of light rain before the heavy mud arrives on T18. So it is not unreasonable to expect all of these objectives to be captured before the heavy rains, which would give a likely HWM of 931 VPs in '41.
Additionally Astrakhan (30VPs) seems a bit tough to defend for the Soviets. The Axis troops are within striking distance and the location is rather difficult to reinforce for the Soviets after the rail line got cut. It is also in the "arid steppes" climate that has clear weather until late November and a very low chance of blizzard. My intention was to keep attacking in this area even after switching to the defensive on the rest of the front.
As of mid-September, the Axis advance is close to the A-A line at most locations (Yaroslavl, Gorky, Saratov, Stalingrad, Astrakhan). I could probably get pretty close to Kazan too, but there's nothing in the Volga uplands that seems worth the front line extension.
The Axis losses from the summer campaign are relatively light overall. In terms of artillery, tanks and aircraft I actually have a bit more than on T1. On-map German manpower is 200k lower, but with 400k in pool that should not be hard to replace once the supply situation improves. (Granted, that may take until spring.) The Soviet losses are, in all likelihood, heavy enough to blunt any winter offensive.
I'd like to thank AtAtack for a hard fought game. Thanks to everyone else too, for reading through to the end of this AAR and for your thoughtful comments and questions!
"Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views beyond the comprehension of the weak" - John Adams
Re: Game conclusion
Well done to both of you.K62 wrote: Wed Jan 04, 2023 1:39 am At this point my opponent has graciously conceded. It will be quite difficult for the Soviets to recover after the impending loss of all industry in Stalingrad and Gorky.
The Axis HWM is 831 VPs as of T14 and the following objective cities are also pocketed: Stalingrad (30 VPs), Krasnodar (10), Voronezh (10), Gorky (10), Yaroslavl (10). The weather prognosis for T15 is clear weather at all of these locations, and the expectation is for two more turns of light rain before the heavy mud arrives on T18. So it is not unreasonable to expect all of these objectives to be captured before the heavy rains, which would give a likely HWM of 931 VPs in '41.
Additionally Astrakhan (30VPs) seems a bit tough to defend for the Soviets. The Axis troops are within striking distance and the location is rather difficult to reinforce for the Soviets after the rail line got cut. It is also in the "arid steppes" climate that has clear weather until late November and a very low chance of blizzard. My intention was to keep attacking in this area even after switching to the defensive on the rest of the front.
As of mid-September, the Axis advance is close to the A-A line at most locations (Yaroslavl, Gorky, Saratov, Stalingrad, Astrakhan). I could probably get pretty close to Kazan too, but there's nothing in the Volga uplands that seems worth the front line extension.
The Axis losses from the summer campaign are relatively light overall. In terms of artillery, tanks and aircraft I actually have a bit more than on T1. On-map German manpower is 200k lower, but with 400k in pool that should not be hard to replace once the supply situation improves. (Granted, that may take until spring.) The Soviet losses are, in all likelihood, heavy enough to blunt any winter offensive.
I'd like to thank AtAtack for a hard fought game. Thanks to everyone else too, for reading through to the end of this AAR and for your thoughtful comments and questions!
-
- Posts: 635
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2014 11:01 pm
Re: Thunder in the East - GC41 NEE K62 (A) vs AtAtack (S)
Congrats on your victory and well done to AtAtack on hanging on for so long.
How much did you use temp motorization after the first turn?
I haven't played the Soviet side in the campaign - to what extent were the 500k that AtAtack had in his reserve in the early turns "stuck" and unable to be immediately deployed? The game felt like the Soviet OOB never got started at all which compared to other games seems a bit unusual.
Well played both
!
How much did you use temp motorization after the first turn?
I haven't played the Soviet side in the campaign - to what extent were the 500k that AtAtack had in his reserve in the early turns "stuck" and unable to be immediately deployed? The game felt like the Soviet OOB never got started at all which compared to other games seems a bit unusual.
Well played both

Re: Thunder in the East - GC41 NEE K62 (A) vs AtAtack (S)
I motorized one division per turn but not always. On some turns it was a single regiment and on other turns nothing, The biggest difference it made was, when breaking into the Crimea, being able to pocket the Perekop garrison. This led to Sevastopol falling 2-3 turns faster than I had planned.Sammy5IsAlive wrote: Wed Jan 04, 2023 11:46 am How much did you use temp motorization after the first turn?
So overall it was useful but not as much as open TBs. This let me get the best SUs from the TBs. They participated in a lot of battles and secured a lot of vulnerable flanks against Soviet counter-attack.
"Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views beyond the comprehension of the weak" - John Adams
- EwaldvonKleist
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 3:58 pm
- Location: Berlin, Germany
Re: Thunder in the East - GC41 NEE K62 (A) vs AtAtack (S)
Congratulations to both of you and very good job! Thanks for doing the AAR, I hope it was not the last 
Especially impressive logistics and quick dash for Moscow T7-T9.

Especially impressive logistics and quick dash for Moscow T7-T9.
The Library of Gary Grigsby's War in the East resources.
Do you want total war? Guide for WitE players
WitE2&RtW3 tester
Do you want total war? Guide for WitE players
WitE2&RtW3 tester
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:55 am
Re: Thunder in the East - GC41 NEE K62 (A) vs AtAtack (S)
Impressive campaigning. Thanks for the AAR
Re: Thunder in the East - GC41 NEE K62 (A) vs AtAtack (S)
Thanks everyone for the kind comments! For anyone interested in logistics, here are some short summaries for each turn from the logistics report:
The drive on Moscow was mainly supported by the Minsk-Gomel-Bryansk-Orel-Tula railway. I used super depots at Bryansk and then Tula.
Code: Select all
T2
Sup Need Sup Rec Sup Lost RepFr Rec RepMn Rec RepFr Lost
1521 3328 1134 3722 4350 17 1st Panzer Group
1247 2628 1075 1055 2178 2 2nd Panzer Group
1552 2142 1234 2222 3169 40 3rd Panzer Group
1299 2045 1125 1810 2263 8 4th Panzer Group
11051 36282 7687 17186 50322 79 GROUND COMMAND TOTALS
8692 9533 411 5167 28059 17 AIR COMMAND TOTALS
T3
Sup Need Sup Rec Sup Lost RepFr Rec RepMn Rec RepFr Lost
2333 3887 1619 2755 1113 0 1st Panzer Group
1680 2960 1682 455 525 4 2nd Panzer Group
1316 2295 1276 549 669 0 3rd Panzer Group
1342 2112 990 439 301 26 4th Panzer Group
11078 42960 10879 6856 18444 43 GROUND COMMAND TOTALS
4747 14382 1358 3152 19377 10 AIR COMMAND TOTALS
T4
Sup Need Sup Rec Sup Lost RepFr Rec RepMn Rec RepFr Lost
1777 3051 1432 2024 1326 0 1st Panzer Group
2172 2967 1445 397 624 5 2nd Panzer Group
1202 1883 949 715 1201 0 3rd Panzer Group
919 1873 951 519 729 0 4th Panzer Group
11919 33871 10343 6861 17043 19 GROUND COMMAND TOTALS
3584 8366 585 2513 15765 8 AIR COMMAND TOTALS
T5
Sup Need Sup Rec Sup Lost RepFr Rec RepMn Rec RepFr Lost
1618 2326 1191 1132 1578 2 1st Panzer Group
2941 2952 2003 1107 1069 13 2nd Panzer Group
1066 1082 709 120 505 0 3rd Panzer Group
855 2210 1019 494 932 11 4th Panzer Group
14157 29233 10696 6814 23909 52 GROUND COMMAND TOTALS
6537 9452 1332 4392 27494 16 AIR COMMAND TOTALS
T6
Sup Need Sup Rec Sup Lost RepFr Rec RepMn Rec RepFr Lost
2062 2738 1583 1220 1325 7 1st Panzer Group
3413 1742 1145 538 243 11 2nd Panzer Group
1486 858 639 212 283 0 3rd Panzer Group
2068 2271 1165 539 1797 2 4th Panzer Group
21033 28130 9862 3964 9343 38 GROUND COMMAND TOTALS
5418 8783 1151 3091 19799 13 AIR COMMAND TOTALS
T7
Sup Need Sup Rec Sup Lost RepFr Rec RepMn Rec RepFr Lost
1989 2805 1399 910 3184 5 1st Panzer Group
3802 2846 1235 542 502 1 2nd Panzer Group
2070 1729 767 74 203 0 3rd Panzer Group
2086 2432 1509 1107 2258 39 4th Panzer Group
23959 30209 10111 4651 16642 79 GROUND COMMAND TOTALS
3595 7315 750 1766 11472 14 AIR COMMAND TOTALS
T8
Sup Need Sup Rec Sup Lost RepFr Rec RepMn Rec RepFr Lost
2159 2992 1751 1316 5034 2 1st Panzer Group
3643 3722 1936 2327 7166 70 2nd Panzer Group
2623 2115 1188 501 1812 5 3rd Panzer Group
1934 2503 1376 795 4011 37 4th Panzer Group
25217 34559 11576 6584 26450 120 GROUND COMMAND TOTALS
2127 4218 590 1364 8325 2 AIR COMMAND TOTALS
T9
Sup Need Sup Rec Sup Lost RepFr Rec RepMn Rec RepFr Lost
2469 2499 1459 203 286 0 1st Panzer Group
3230 2922 1886 1351 2016 6 2nd Panzer Group
2403 1970 1225 299 1184 4 3rd Panzer Group
2435 2670 1236 1235 2411 50 4th Panzer Group
24613 29146 11476 5130 16750 87 GROUND COMMAND TOTALS
6576 9267 1062 2769 18129 22 AIR COMMAND TOTALS
T10
Sup Need Sup Rec Sup Lost RepFr Rec RepMn Rec RepFr Lost
3021 2223 1209 1209 4556 30 1st Panzer Group
2370 2092 956 957 2818 37 3rd Panzer Group
2463 2600 1705 1847 3764 15 2nd Panzer Group
1969 2767 1241 553 2207 9 4th Panzer Group
23855 28482 10363 6841 22132 106 GROUND COMMAND TOTALS
3959 6543 612 2434 14121 11 AIR COMMAND TOTALS
T11
Sup Need Sup Rec Sup Lost RepFr Rec RepMn Rec RepFr Lost
3522 3826 1817 349 1468 2 1st Panzer Group
2649 2425 1149 1141 1782 52 3rd Panzer Group
3007 2901 1615 1046 2594 14 2nd Panzer Group
2059 2374 1063 1343 3573 3 4th Panzer Group
27797 30880 11380 5544 18077 86 GROUND COMMAND TOTALS
1752 4588 504 921 5705 1 AIR COMMAND TOTALS
T12
Sup Need Sup Rec Sup Lost RepFr Rec RepMn Rec RepFr Lost
2600 2198 1289 1150 2766 8 1st Panzer Group
2473 2161 1194 1553 3989 27 3rd Panzer Group
2906 2991 1292 1784 6744 9 2nd Panzer Group
1677 2442 1183 1544 1139 1 4th Panzer Group
26277 28537 9921 7736 22743 56 GROUND COMMAND TOTALS
2137 4046 582 947 6234 7 AIR COMMAND TOTALS
T13
Sup Need Sup Rec Sup Lost RepFr Rec RepMn Rec RepFr Lost
2555 1459 947 555 1091 11 1st Panzer Group
2987 2148 1299 885 3543 53 3rd Panzer Group
3362 2616 1513 348 1414 0 2nd Panzer Group
2263 2188 1309 539 984 9 4th Panzer Group
28349 25944 9542 3967 15288 86 GROUND COMMAND TOTALS
4295 5696 643 1473 9497 8 AIR COMMAND TOTALS
T14
Sup Need Sup Rec Sup Lost RepFr Rec RepMn Rec RepFr Lost
2474 1239 929 381 416 0 1st Panzer Group
2895 1980 1317 751 1581 15 3rd Panzer Group
3111 2453 1715 615 1138 1 2nd Panzer Group
3734 2233 1552 787 860 30 4th Panzer Group
31815 26601 10722 5509 21258 56 GROUND COMMAND TOTALS
4801 7197 513 781 4331 5 AIR COMMAND TOTALS
"Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views beyond the comprehension of the weak" - John Adams
Re: Thunder in the East - GC41 NEE K62 (A) vs AtAtack (S)
And here's a comparison of trucks etc. between the start and the end of the campaign. There were a bit over 40,000 captured Soviet trucks in total.
"Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views beyond the comprehension of the weak" - John Adams
- Commanderski
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:24 pm
- Location: New Hampshire
Re: Thunder in the East - GC41 NEE K62 (A) vs AtAtack (S)
Did you do anything with your Luftwaffe? I would be interested in your air settings as you did move remarkably fast.
Also do you think there was anyway your opponent could have stopped you?
Also do you think there was anyway your opponent could have stopped you?
Re: Thunder in the East - GC41 NEE K62 (A) vs AtAtack (S)
I've used the Luftwaffe a lot but always mindful of how it consumes freight. Only fighters came forward consistently with the panzer groups. LBs operated from the border airfields and did a lot of ground support while in range. I also built or extended several airfields in the Tulcea area so they could support operations in the Crimea. Recon was done mostly by long-range recon, also operating from the border airfields as long as possible. I did move Stukas forward for the final advance on Leningrad but they were only there for one turn. Ju52s were brought from all the TBs and they saved a lot of trucks by moving freight closer to the front line. I had them on trained pilots only, but they still suffered a lot of operational losses - the only plane type that couldn't be completely replenished from production.Commanderski wrote: Fri Jan 06, 2023 2:25 am Did you do anything with your Luftwaffe? I would be interested in your air settings as you did move remarkably fast.
Also do you think there was anyway your opponent could have stopped you?
I can't speak for my opponent but AtAtack is welcome to comment here anytime. The Soviet defense was very tough in areas where it had time to settle down. But the reason the Germans are so strong in '41 is that they can often maneuver around those areas.
"Power always thinks it has a great soul and vast views beyond the comprehension of the weak" - John Adams