Manufacturer's specs typically are overblown. When they test and publish ranges, they are usually flying a stripped version of the craft, as additional gizmos that add weight are added later.Originally posted by Joel Billings
Very interesting discussions. Just wanted to state that on page 74 in the manual it says that transport missions are flown to 1/2 the maximum range of the aircraft. I don't know how range impacts the load carried (or if it does). Also, I know that Gary has spent many many hours over the years looking at the conflicting information regarding aircraft performance. I'm not claiming that he got everything right, but I do think he usually has good reasons for why he does things the way he does. There is a lot that goes into these numbers, which are often simplifications of the many complex issues involved. From what I remember Gary also doesn't think too highly of manufacturer specs, except as just another data point.
Be all this as it may, its quite clear to me that the normal range (one way trip) was around 1500 miles, but that it was a very common practice to add bulk fuel tanks or jerrycans in the cargo compartment to extend the range of the aircraft. The game does not account for this. I don't expect it to account for everything.
It was such a common practice I would say it was the norm. This is the only reason to explain the plethora of data about the military C-47 which claims ranges in excess of 1500 miles. Clearly, in the real war, if there was a need for transport aircraft to fly round trips beyond the fuel tank capacity of the Dakota, it was standard practice to load jerrycans. This doesn't require special equipment or mods to the craft.
As a result of the mechanics of the game formula, the Dakota has far less utility than one would expect from a piece of equipment that Eisenhower rated alongside the Atom Bomb as one of the things that won the war for the Allies.