2.42B revisited

Uncommon Valor: Campaign for the South Pacific covers the campaigns for New Guinea, New Britain, New Ireland and the Solomon chain.

Moderators: Joel Billings, Tankerace, siRkid

User avatar
Mike Wood
Posts: 1424
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Oakland, California
Contact:

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Mike Wood »

Hello...

Gary and I are working on something. Cannot say more.

Bye...

Michael Wood
ORIGINAL: Skyfire76

ORIGINAL: Mike Wood

Hello...

No news yet, on patch.

Bye...

Michael Wood

Fair enough, I understand UV is a rather old game now and is not on top of the priorities list [:)]

The question is, though (and I know you saw it coming [;)]) : when ?

Regards.

User avatar
Skyfire7631
Posts: 222
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Toulouse, France

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Skyfire7631 »

ORIGINAL: Mike Wood

Hello...

Gary and I are working on something. Cannot say more.

Bye...

Michael Wood

Ok, understood (I think) [;)] Keep us updated if you can [:)]

Regards.

P_DEX
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:29 pm

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by P_DEX »

Cool. Thanks for the update Mike.

Had no idea you had Gary helping you out as well! Excellent.
Maroc
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 1:54 am
Location: Lancashire.UK

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Maroc »

Hi guys, I have just gotten hold of a copy of this game and it looks to be a real gem, but I am wondering what patch I should settle on using?? what is the standard when playing PBEM games for instance... thanks
jmkas
Posts: 35
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2003 10:45 pm
Location: Sparks MD

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by jmkas »

You and your PBEM opponet must be at the same patch level for PBEM games to work - most seem to like 2.3, but check under the opponets wanted forum to see what is preferred.
Maroc
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 1:54 am
Location: Lancashire.UK

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Maroc »

I am some way off a human opponent at present!! but I may as well get used to the way I will play when I get there... so 2.3 it is. thanks for the advice jmkas.... now then back to the manual...barges, barges... ah yes 8.20 page 32...[:)]
User avatar
CatLord
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 1:35 pm
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland
Contact:

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by CatLord »

From WitP forum:
ORIGINAL: Alex Fiedler

Long-Awaited Major Update Now Available!

Matrix Games and 2by3 Games (www.2by3games.com) are pleased to announce the release of the v1.80 update for the acclaimed War In The Pacific.

(snip)

More important are the fixes, which include an overhaul of the pilot tracking an allocation system, a fix for occasional “lost” leaders, a fix for land unit fragment loss and loss during air transport and many more.

Would that help in producing the next UV patch for the disappearing aircrafts ?

Cat
Member of the Revolution Under Siege development team.
User avatar
Mike Wood
Posts: 1424
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Oakland, California
Contact:

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Mike Wood »

Hello...

Will be adding relevant changes from WIP 1.80 to WPO and UV and fix UV aircraft problem. Will take a bit.

Bye...

Michael Wood
ORIGINAL: CatLord

From WitP forum:
ORIGINAL: Alex Fiedler

Long-Awaited Major Update Now Available!

Matrix Games and 2by3 Games (www.2by3games.com) are pleased to announce the release of the v1.80 update for the acclaimed War In The Pacific.

(snip)

More important are the fixes, which include an overhaul of the pilot tracking an allocation system, a fix for occasional “lost” leaders, a fix for land unit fragment loss and loss during air transport and many more.

Would that help in producing the next UV patch for the disappearing aircrafts ?

Cat
Denniss
Posts: 9160
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Germany, Hannover (region)

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Denniss »

ORIGINAL: Mike Wood

Hello...

Will be adding relevant changes from WIP 1.80 to WPO and UV and fix UV aircraft problem. Will take a bit.

Bye...

Michael Wood

Thank you for the update! So there's still some hope for us UV veterans to see a new patch improving the game.
WitE dev team - (aircraft data)
WitE 1.08+ dev team (data/scenario maintainer)
WitW dev team (aircraft data, partial data/scenario maintainer)
WitE2 dev team (aircraft data)
User avatar
DEB
Posts: 691
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 6:39 pm
Location: Bristol , England

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by DEB »

ORIGINAL: Mike Wood

Hello...

Will be adding relevant changes from WIP 1.80 to WPO and UV and fix UV aircraft problem. Will take a bit.

Bye...

Michael Wood

Message below, sent 10th April 2005 refers. Is a fix for this to be included? [&o]

Shortly after the start of Sc. 11 the computer moved TF 230 ( USS Drum - SS ) onto 19,30 - a land hex ! It is now immovable - although it is still registered as "at Sea".
Under a previous patch this error was "corrected" - possibley only for particular Sc. known. If another patch ( 2.42 ? ) is done (re disappearing C-47's ), can this be fixed also?

< Message edited by DEB -- 4/10/2005 11:33:08 PM >
Forwarn45
Posts: 718
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 1:53 am

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Forwarn45 »

Hello...

Will be adding relevant changes from WIP 1.80 to WPO and UV and fix UV aircraft problem. Will take a bit.

Bye...

Michael Wood

That's great news. I look forward to trying a PBEM at that point if I don't give in and try before then. [;)]
User avatar
DEB
Posts: 691
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 6:39 pm
Location: Bristol , England

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by DEB »

I'm having an interesting bug attack... A Japanese unit trying to disengage from battle on the beach near Lunga boarded one of my Allied submarines. I had 1300 Japs on a sub that can only carry 24 passengers. At first I didn't even notice that they were enemy troops and almost took them back to Nomea. Now I've spent about two weeks trying to get the drunken renegade Japs to get off my boat! I'm contemplating just sending the stupid thing back to pearl (Japs & all) & just intern them as POWs for remainder of scenario.


Mr Wood - Something else to work on!
( Copy forwarded in case you have not seen it. )
User avatar
Skyfire7631
Posts: 222
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Toulouse, France

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Skyfire7631 »

Ok, I wouldn't want to bump this but .... erhh ... ok ... I DO want to bump this :

BUMP !

[;)]

Regards.
User avatar
DEB
Posts: 691
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 6:39 pm
Location: Bristol , England

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by DEB »

ORIGINAL: DEB

ORIGINAL: Mike Wood

Hello...

Will be adding relevant changes from WIP 1.80 to WPO and UV and fix UV aircraft problem. Will take a bit.

Bye...

Michael Wood

Message below, sent 10th April 2005 refers. Is a fix for this to be included? [&o]

Shortly after the start of Sc. 11 the computer moved TF 230 ( USS Drum - SS ) onto 19,30 - a land hex ! It is now immovable - although it is still registered as "at Sea".
Under a previous patch this error was "corrected" - possibley only for particular Sc. known. If another patch ( 2.42 ? ) is done (re disappearing C-47's ), can this be fixed also?

< Message edited by DEB -- 4/10/2005 11:33:08 PM >


Ummm ! Is it really over 14 months since the above was posted. it appears so !

Any update/news Mr Wood ?
User avatar
Mike Wood
Posts: 1424
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Oakland, California
Contact:

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Mike Wood »

Hello...

No news.

Working on secret game, right now...

Michael Wood
ORIGINAL: DEB

ORIGINAL: DEB

ORIGINAL: Mike Wood

Hello...

Will be adding relevant changes from WIP 1.80 to WPO and UV and fix UV aircraft problem. Will take a bit.

Bye...

Michael Wood

Message below, sent 10th April 2005 refers. Is a fix for this to be included? [&o]

Shortly after the start of Sc. 11 the computer moved TF 230 ( USS Drum - SS ) onto 19,30 - a land hex ! It is now immovable - although it is still registered as "at Sea".
Under a previous patch this error was "corrected" - possibley only for particular Sc. known. If another patch ( 2.42 ? ) is done (re disappearing C-47's ), can this be fixed also?

< Message edited by DEB -- 4/10/2005 11:33:08 PM >


Ummm ! Is it really over 14 months since the above was posted. it appears so !

Any update/news Mr Wood ?
User avatar
Mike Wethington
Posts: 60
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 3:10 pm
Location: Austin, TX (A Blue Atoll in an Ocean of Red)

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Mike Wethington »

Secret game? Something about Bletchley Park (you too can be Alan Turing!) or Purple? The long awaited PC port of TSRs Spies!?
&nbsp;
How about a good strategic level sim of WWI or the American Civil War ala WitP?
&nbsp;
We all await news.
User avatar
Skyfire7631
Posts: 222
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Toulouse, France

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Skyfire7631 »

Secret game ? Hmmm, yummy [:)]
&nbsp;
But what about a little last patch for UV before being commited too much with that secret game, hey ? [;)]
&nbsp;
Regards.
&nbsp;
User avatar
DEB
Posts: 691
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 6:39 pm
Location: Bristol , England

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by DEB »

ORIGINAL: Skyfire76

But what about a little last patch for UV before being commited too much with that secret game, hey ? [;)]

Regards.

Well said that man !

( Of course the secret game could be UV mind !! ) [X(]
TAIL GUNNER
Posts: 1156
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 5:10 am
Location: Los Osos, CA

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by TAIL GUNNER »

Hello...

No news.

Working on secret game, right now...

Michael Wood

Any chance of giving Joe and Don a shot at it?
(the UV patch that is)
"If you want peace, prepare for war."
User avatar
Skyfire7631
Posts: 222
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Toulouse, France

RE: 2.42B revisited

Post by Skyfire7631 »

ORIGINAL: DEB

Well said that man !

( Of course the secret game could be UV mind !! ) [X(]

Hmmm, good point ... If that's the case, I take back what I said [:D]

Errh, come to think of it, no, actually : I'd still like a last patch for UV [;)]

Regards.

Post Reply

Return to “Uncommon Valor - Campaign for the South Pacific”