ORIGINAL: adarbrauner
Legaspi is a cancer that has to be cut off the earliest
Aye. It has priority.
But this falls against the 'strike where the enemy is not' mandate John (and Sun Tzu) espouse. Legaspi is clearly a focus (if not the focus) of CRs incursion here.
This is where application of distinct military theories and philosophical martial vagaries comes into play. One cannot 'whip out a Sherman' or a Forrest or a Sun Tzu or a Clauswitz. Although, as an aside, I've been accused of whipping out my Clauswitz too quickly at cocktail parties after a few drinks. [;)] What you must do as a player is to view the field of battle independent of any centuries-old bromide.
You want to strike where the enemy is weakest? OK. Maybe one of the islands nearest Australia in the Southern DEI is-comparatively-weaker than Legaspi soon will be. But which is more important to the Allied war effort? Concentration of forces in / around Luzon or holding some God-forsaken malarial fen in the Southern DEI of zero strategic import? I would be delighted as the Allied player if my opponent dispersed his counterattack forces throughout the DEI in dribs and drabs and allowed me to concentrate force on the crown jewel.
So 'strike where the enemy is weakest' if that is important to you. Provided that it doesn't interfere with your ability to strike the enemy in those areas that are actually important to the game, I'm all for it. Given a choice between the two (there's always a choice between the two, isn't there?), there's really not a choice.
Of course, that's just my opinion. YMMV. [8D]