Thread for DB3000 database problems, updates or issues

Post new mods and scenarios here.

Moderator: MOD_Command

mikmykWS
Posts: 7185
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 4:34 pm

RE: DB ID#2862 YJ-12 SSM

Post by mikmykWS »

ORIGINAL: Kitchens Sink

ORIGINAL: Kitchens Sink

This missile looks to be ship/sub capable according to the Launch Altitude Info, but I can't find a mount to use it with, or method to load a Weapons Record to an existing mount for Chinese Ships.

I realize the actual missile may not quite yet be in full service, but I am developing a scenario set in the future and thought I would be able to up-gun a large Chinese warships to carry some of them since the missile does exist in the database.

I am currently using the P-800 Onyx as a stand-in for up-gunning because it's characteristics are similar.

Am I missing something on how to add this missile?

Thanks!

I thought I would bump this to see if the Dev's could give me some help. The missile in question is DB ID #2862 YJ-12 SSM

Thanks!


For now just add the YJ record to an existing mount. If you look int the weapons dialog you can replace both mounts and weapons records (there are add a remove buttons for both). So find an existing missile mount, remove the missile records from it and add the YJ's. There is a 4 record for this. I just tested and fired fine.

Thanks

Mike
Kitchens Sink
Posts: 402
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 8:55 pm

RE: DB ID#2862 YJ-12 SSM

Post by Kitchens Sink »

Ok thanks mike. I'll give it a go again later. Last time I tried I couldn't get that particular missile in the menu options to add to a mount. I guess I made an error somewhere.
Kitchens Sink
Posts: 402
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 8:55 pm

RE: DB ID#2862 YJ-12 SSM

Post by Kitchens Sink »

I see what my problem was.

It seems the only available YJ-12 missile type to load onto a mount is DB ID#2863 (the air-launched version with a minimum launch altitude of 200 ft. AGL) vs. DB ID#2862 (the "SSM" version with a launch altitude of 0ft AGL to -160 ft. AGL). I assumed the Air Launched version wouldn't work on a ship. But like you said I loaded #2863 onto a Chinese type 055 and it fired off ok....so I guess it's all good.

Not sure how it would work on on a submarine, but I may try that out later.

Thanks!
spec111
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2014 8:46 am

RE: DB ID#2862 YJ-12 SSM

Post by spec111 »

Hello! Why tech datas of chinese JYL-1 and REL-6B radars are same? I think JYL-1 is PESA radar and REL-6B is more cheaper and clasical "mechanical" radar. Or it is bug in DB-wiki?


https://wiki.baloogancampaign.com/index ... or?ID=3211 https://wiki.baloogancampaign.com/index ... or?ID=3213
mikmykWS
Posts: 7185
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 4:34 pm

RE: DB ID#2862 YJ-12 SSM

Post by mikmykWS »

ORIGINAL: spec111

Hello! Why tech datas of chinese JYL-1 and REL-6B radars are same? I think JYL-1 is PESA radar and REL-6B is more cheaper and clasical "mechanical" radar. Or it is bug in DB-wiki?


https://wiki.baloogancampaign.com/index ... or?ID=3211 https://wiki.baloogancampaign.com/index ... or?ID=3213

They might be alike. Do you have data ?

Mike
User avatar
Mgellis
Posts: 2318
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:45 pm
Contact:

RE: DB ID#2862 YJ-12 SSM

Post by Mgellis »

Here is something to consider...be scared of...

DJI Phantom 4

Yes, it is a drone. According to Amazon, you can get one for about $1000. Not too shabby if you need a little electronic spy to spot your enemies and direct fire onto them.

Nationality: Generic
Service dates: 2016-present

DJI Phantom 4 Specs

"DJI upped the ante with the Phantom 4 drone. The DJI Phantom 4 quadcopter offers more power, speed, and features than the Phantom 3. This Phantom 4 HD video camera sports 4K resolution, while the drone itself has multiple sensors, dual GPS and GLONASS navigation, an advanced Visual Positioning System (VPS), and automated subject-tracking and obstacle avoidance."

Here is a simplified list of the Phantom 4 specs:

Weight 3 lbs.
Max Ascent Speed 13.4 MPH
Max Descent Speed 8.9 MPH
Max Forward Speed 45 MPH
Max Ceiling 400 ft. (Electronically Limited) <-- another source lists actual ceiling as 6000 m. (Imagine what you can spot at 6000 m. just with your camera.)
Max Flight Time 28 min.
Operating Temp 32° to 104°F
Satellite Systems GPS & GLONASS
Obstacle Sensory Range 2 to 49 ft.
Gimbal Control Range -90° to +30° Pitch
Camera Sensor 1/2.3"
Lens FOV 94°
ISO Range 100-3200
Max Image Size 4000x3000
Max Video Size 4096x2160
Max Video Bitrate 60 Mbps
File Systems FAT32, exFAT
Photo Formats JPEG, DNG
Video Formats MP4, MOV, MPEG
Charger Specs 17.4v, 100w
Remote Frequency 2.400-2.483 GHz
Max Transmission Range 3.1 mi. <-- http://www.drone-world.com/dji-phantom- ... -extender/ offers an extender giving it a 5-mile control range; with 28 minutes of power, the drone could probably fly 5 miles, hover for up to 10 minutes, and then fly 5 miles back.
Battery Model Intelligent Flight PH4
Battery Specs 5,350 mAh, 15.2v

Sources
http://www.drone-world.com/dji-phantom-4-specs
https://www.dji.com/phantom-4/info
https://dl.djicdn.com/downloads/phantom ... n_v1.0.pdf

Thanks for considering this one.
User avatar
Dysta
Posts: 1909
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:32 pm

RE: DB ID#2862 YJ-12 SSM

Post by Dysta »

Mgellis, traditional fix-winged toys could be scary too. And DJI isn't the only brand to be blamed as the terrortist's favorite.

Maybe three generic-based alternatives, and then sub-catalogue them in different sizes?

E.g.:

Generic Unmanned Portable Multi-copter (Hover)
<2KG (Camera only)
2-5KG (w/ <0.5KG payload)
5-10KG (w/ <1KG payload)

Generic Unmanned Portable Aircraft (Fixed-wings)
<2KG (Camera only)
2-5KG (w/ <1KG payload)
5-10KG (w/ <2KG payload)

Generic Unmanned Portable Ornithopter (Powered Glide)
Small (Camara only, imitate small birds, better stealth, short duration)
Large (Camera only, imitate large birds, less stealthy, long duration)
Kynth
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2014 4:15 pm

RE: DB ID#2862 YJ-12 SSM

Post by Kynth »

Images of GBU-39 SDB (#484, 2 x 4 rails) on the AC-130W Stinger II (#3105) starboard and port outer pylons.

Image

Image

Added
spec111
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2014 8:46 am

RE: DB ID#2862 YJ-12 SSM

Post by spec111 »

ORIGINAL: mikmyk

ORIGINAL: spec111

Hello! Why tech datas of chinese JYL-1 and REL-6B radars are same? I think JYL-1 is PESA radar and REL-6B is more cheaper and clasical "mechanical" radar. Or it is bug in DB-wiki?


https://wiki.baloogancampaign.com/index ... or?ID=3211 https://wiki.baloogancampaign.com/index ... or?ID=3213

They might be alike. Do you have data ?

Mike


REL-6B
Frequency: 1-2 GHz
Detection range: 300 km (csc² beam, free space); 360 km (pencil beam, free space)
Accuracy: 0.6º (azimuth); 400 m (range)
Resolution: 1.1º (azimuth); 700 m (range)


JYL-1
Specifications
Range: >= 350 km (Pd = 0.8, Pf =10-6, SWI, {sigma} = 2 m²)
Coverage: 0º ~ 25º (elevation - Pd = 0.8, Pf =10-6, SWI, {sigma} = 2 m²); 0º ~ 360º (azimuth - Pd = 0.8, Pf =10-6,
SWI, {sigma} = 2 m²): >= 30,000 m (height - Pd = 0.8, Pf =10-6, SWI, {sigma} = 2 m²)
Accuracy: <= 0.25º RMS (azimuth); <= 80 m RMS (range); <= 600 m RMS (height, at 200 km range)
Resolution: 2º (azimuth - Pd = 0.5); 180 m (range - Pd = 0.5)
MTBCF: >= 800 h
MTTR: <= 30 min
Set-up/tear-down time: <= 1 h (crew of 8 people)

From Janes Radar and Electronic Warfare Systems.

Updated Thanks!
spec111
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2014 8:46 am

RE: DB ID#2862 YJ-12 SSM

Post by spec111 »

Mike, what about this?
ORIGINAL: spec111

Hello! There is HUGE MAJOR error of S-300P-series organization in Command!

Lets look at S-300PS. Whole AD system is called BRIGADE! (It is given to Front\Military Region Command in peace time.)

Brigade has HQ Vehicle 5N83S, 36D6 Tin Shield B Radar and 4 (for PS and PMU, and up to 6 for PMU-1) AD BNs (which is called "Antiaircraft Missile Complex".)

Every BN has:
HQ Vehicle 5N63S, 5N63S Flap Lid B and 5N66 Clam Shell B radars.
And up to four "Launch Complexes" (which is batteries). Every battery consists one "master" (with firecontrol box) 5P85S TEL and two "slave" (without firecontrol box) 5P85D TELs. So every "master" TEL can support only two "slave" TELs.

So at maximum in battalion we have 3x4=12 TELs.

12! Not four as we have on chinese SA-20a "Bn" (which is supplied with full pack of BNs radars). And not four as we have with SA-20b "Bn" (i.e. errorish battery which is supplied with _BRIGADE_ level Cheese Board long-range radar!).

In fact there is same problem with russian S-300V. With 9 TELs+LLVs it is not BN, it is only regular battery!

Thx.
mikmykWS
Posts: 7185
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 4:34 pm

RE: DB ID#2862 YJ-12 SSM

Post by mikmykWS »

ORIGINAL: spec111

Mike, what about this?
ORIGINAL: spec111

Hello! There is HUGE MAJOR error of S-300P-series organization in Command!

Lets look at S-300PS. Whole AD system is called BRIGADE! (It is given to Front\Military Region Command in peace time.)

Brigade has HQ Vehicle 5N83S, 36D6 Tin Shield B Radar and 4 (for PS and PMU, and up to 6 for PMU-1) AD BNs (which is called "Antiaircraft Missile Complex".)

Every BN has:
HQ Vehicle 5N63S, 5N63S Flap Lid B and 5N66 Clam Shell B radars.
And up to four "Launch Complexes" (which is batteries). Every battery consists one "master" (with firecontrol box) 5P85S TEL and two "slave" (without firecontrol box) 5P85D TELs. So every "master" TEL can support only two "slave" TELs.

So at maximum in battalion we have 3x4=12 TELs.

12! Not four as we have on chinese SA-20a "Bn" (which is supplied with full pack of BNs radars). And not four as we have with SA-20b "Bn" (i.e. errorish battery which is supplied with _BRIGADE_ level Cheese Board long-range radar!).

In fact there is same problem with russian S-300V. With 9 TELs+LLVs it is not BN, it is only regular battery!

Thx.

Its interesting and will definitely look into it when I'm working on database stuff again.

Mike
Kynth
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2014 4:15 pm

RE: DB ID#2862 YJ-12 SSM

Post by Kynth »

Image

Sea Hercules C.6 (SC-130J-30) - Country: United Kingdom

Could we add a new hypothetical unit to the database please?

It is for the UK-specific proposal for an SC-130J Sea Hercules which, although not the favourite to win, was a serious option prior to the UK selecting the P-8A Poseidon.

This hypothetical aircraft is particularly interesting because it is not simply an Orion-in-a-Hercules solution as per the generic version being pitched globally.

Instead, using an expanded version of the palletised, Ro-Ro, Merlin Cerberus system, it would have been capable of both ASW and the Crowsnest's ASaC role - a unique platform trading the high altitude ASW (HAASW) capability of the P-8A with its long-range HAAWC torpedos for something a little more "British" in lower altitude surveillance, ELINT and hunting.

A backdrop to the proposal included the UK's decision to life-extend their C.6 fleet in the SDSR 2015 review. This decision part-reversed the planned fleet retirement and further fuelled speculation that there was a way in for an expanded "Ro-Ro" Hercules fleet, incorporating the Sea Herc.

The SC-130J proposal from LM was based on modifying 10 existing RAF stretched C-130J-30's before 2020, so the C.6 (#4374) may be the closest aircraft to base this on. In addition to the aircraft crews, training and support infrastructure already existed entirely in the UK leading to a rapid stand-up time predicted for a squadron.

The common aircraft modifications proposed included:

- Lengthened sponsons holding a pair of weapons bays and extended fuel tanks. Models shown at conferences suggest a 4-6 Torpedo capacity, up to 3 per bay. In RAF service these would most likely be Stingray [sic] Mod 1's (#1596).
- An MX-20HD turret on the chin (Closest match in the database is the AN/ASX-4 Sensor Group #3017)
- A Radome on the belly for 360 degree unrestricted view housing an AESA, though the Searchwater 2000 (#5539) used on the Crowsnest is a good match and a plausible selection

The existing outer wing pylons with dual strongbacks would be retained. Possible stores on the pylons include

- 4 x Harpoon - Explicitly mentioned by LM as part of the pitch, likely AGM-84L Harpoon II (#816) given the timelines)
- 6 x Brimstone 2 (#3035) - Speculative: 8 x Hellfire 2 was frequently discussed by commentators as already demonstrated on the similar KC-130J, however the UK is integrating the 2 x 3 rail launched indigenous weapon on several platforms.
- 2 x Storm Shadow (#957) - Speculative: Purely based on 4 pictured on the Nimrod MRA.4, reprinted in the press at the time of Sea Hercules proposal, and speculation at the time. Unsure if the strongbacks can support a dual load per pylon.
- 4 x JSM (#2885) - Speculative: Based on this weeks announcement that Kongsberg will integrate JSM onto the P-8A ahead of the Norwegian purchase, with significant UK interest due to sharing P-8A and F-35A/B platforms. Lighter missile can be supported in pairs by the strongback pylons.

The mission systems and stores proposed were all expanded, palletised, Roll-on, Roll-off equipment from the Merlin HM.2 and Crowsnest program (ASW and ASaC/AEW functions).

- ESM explicitly mentioned by LM. Merlin uses Orange Reaper #2900.
- An optional MAD was pitched.
- For sonobuoys, a rotary door ejector was listed and the Hercules carrying capacity mentioned as an advantage over the P-8A. It is more likely that full A-sized sonobuoys would have been used than the smaller versions carried by helicopters (#2549, #2541 and #2505 are from the MRA.4 record, although UK company ULTRA also manufactures the P-8A sonobuoys for the USN #1939, #2482 and #2496)
- Comms/Datalinks are as per C.6, but the pallets introduce Link-16, Ku Satcom, INMARSAT and WBDL.

Given the above, Loadouts would likely have been:

- Cargo and Passengers as per baseline C.6 as the Palletised Ro-Ro system was explicitly advertised as not changing these capabilities.
- SAR
- Maritime Surveillance
- 6 x Stingray, Sonobouys (ASW)
- 6 x Stingray, 4 x Harpoon II, Sonobouys (Sea Control)
- 6 x Stingray, 4 x JSM, Sonobouys (Sea Control)
- 6 x Stingray, 6 x Brimstone, Sonobouys (Littoral Sea Control)
- 2 x Storm Shadow (Stand Off Land Strike)
- 4 x JSM (Long Range ASuW Strike, land attack capability)
- Pallet change times for the advanced roles were variously stated, 30 minute pallet load + 15 minute power-checks given for the pallets for example. Though I imagine weapon loads could take longer on top of that?

"Merlin Cerberus" SC-130J materials for further reading:

http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.ph ... needs.html

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/artic ... to-416741/

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

A video covering the basics:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjFijMCgh24

"Generic" SC-130J materials for an aircraft based on P-3C systems for further reading:

http://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/d ... 0Media.pdf

http://www.lockheedmartin.com/content/d ... 20Bell.pdf

EDIT: MAD was later announced as an option.
mikmykWS
Posts: 7185
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 4:34 pm

RE: DB ID#2862 YJ-12 SSM

Post by mikmykWS »

ORIGINAL: spec111

Hello! There is HUGE MAJOR error of S-300P-series organization in Command!

Lets look at S-300PS. Whole AD system is called BRIGADE! (It is given to Front\Military Region Command in peace time.)

Brigade has HQ Vehicle 5N83S, 36D6 Tin Shield B Radar and 4 (for PS and PMU, and up to 6 for PMU-1) AD BNs (which is called "Antiaircraft Missile Complex".)

Every BN has:
HQ Vehicle 5N63S, 5N63S Flap Lid B and 5N66 Clam Shell B radars.
And up to four "Launch Complexes" (which is batteries). Every battery consists one "master" (with firecontrol box) 5P85S TEL and two "slave" (without firecontrol box) 5P85D TELs. So every "master" TEL can support only two "slave" TELs.

So at maximum in battalion we have 3x4=12 TELs.

12! Not four as we have on chinese SA-20a "Bn" (which is supplied with full pack of BNs radars). And not four as we have with SA-20b "Bn" (i.e. errorish battery which is supplied with _BRIGADE_ level Cheese Board long-range radar!).

In fact there is same problem with russian S-300V. With 9 TELs+LLVs it is not BN, it is only regular battery!

Thx.

Ok I see what you're talking about and have no idea why we named things the way we did unless somebody had other info. The good news is if you're right the confusions seems to be Bty vs. Battalion which isn't a hard fix. Anyways will converse with the team. In the mean time use as battery's and ignore the word[:)]
orca
Posts: 545
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 4:59 pm

RE: DB ID#2862 YJ-12 SSM

Post by orca »

ORIGINAL: Kitchens Sink

ORIGINAL: Kitchens Sink

This missile looks to be ship/sub capable according to the Launch Altitude Info, but I can't find a mount to use it with, or method to load a Weapons Record to an existing mount for Chinese Ships.

I realize the actual missile may not quite yet be in full service, but I am developing a scenario set in the future and thought I would be able to up-gun a large Chinese warships to carry some of them since the missile does exist in the database.

I am currently using the P-800 Onyx as a stand-in for up-gunning because it's characteristics are similar.

Am I missing something on how to add this missile?

Thanks!

I thought I would bump this to see if the Dev's could give me some help. The missile in question is DB ID #2862 YJ-12 SSM

Thanks!

I also noticed the SSM YJ-12 missile is in the DB viewer but doesn't show up when attempting to add weapon record. The air launched YJ-12 seems to be there but not the SSM version.
Kitchens Sink
Posts: 402
Joined: Sun May 04, 2014 8:55 pm

RE: DB ID#2862 YJ-12 SSM

Post by Kitchens Sink »

Yes orca, I think I officially flogged the deceased equine with this post:

fb.asp?m=4227129

Not a big deal since the air launched version seems to work on a ship, even though it has a min launch altitude of 200 ft. AGL.
SASR
Posts: 82
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2015 2:59 am

RE: DB ID#2862 YJ-12 SSM

Post by SASR »

Some new SHORAD/C-RAM for the US Army......

Overview: http://asc.army.mil/web/portfolio-item/ms-ifpc_inc_2-i/
The Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2 – Intercept (IFPC Increment 2-I) Block 1 System is a mobile, ground-based weapon system designed to defeat unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) and cruise missiles.

The Block 1 system will use an existing interceptor and sensor and will develop a Multi-Mission Launcher (MML) on an existing vehicle platform to support the Counter-UAS (C-UAS) and Cruise Missile Defense (CMD) missions. The system will use the Army Integrated Air and Missile Defense (AIAMD) open systems architecture, and will use the AIAMD Integrated Battle Command System as its mission command component.

The radar is the AN/MPQ-64F1 Improved Sentinel: http://www.thalesraytheon.com/fileadmin ... l_2011.pdf
AN/MPQ-64F1 Improved Sentinel
Specifications
Range Extension Improvement &#9632; Improved target detection at extended
ranges - especially cruise missiles
(CM) and Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
(UAV)
&#9632; Improved target detection for Rotary
Wing (RW) and Fixed Wing (FW)
aircraft
&#9632; Improved capability to cue targets
beyond visual range
Signal Data Processor &#9632; 10 slot VME-64x Rack with slots
available for growth
&#9632; Multiple On-board computers

Receiver &#9632; X-Band, single channel
&#9632; Single LRU
Exciter &#9632; X-Band, DDS Technology
&#9632; Single Master Oscillator
upconverted to generate frequency
&#9632; Single LRU
Transmitter &#9632; X-Band, Multiple TWT
&#9632; Low/Mid/High PRFs

Motor Controller &#9632; Digital Interface to the Signal Data
Processor
&#9632; Improved DC Motor and Controller
New Operating Modes &#9632; Full Coverage Mode - Surveillance
from Horizon (terrain) to ~18
degrees, providing balanced height
coverage
&#9632; Low Altitude Coverage Mode -
Surveillance from Horizon to ~5
degrees, providing focused energy
and fast revisit times for low altitude
advanced target threats (cruise
missiles, UAVs)
The radar will detect, identify, classify and track aircraft (i.e., Fixed Wing, Rotary
Wing, etc.) from the nap of the earth to 55º in elevation and 360º azimuth within an airspace search
range of more than 75km.

From: http://defense-update.com/20150328_mml.html
The Improved Sentinel (AN/MPQ-64F1) is a 3D phased array tactical air defense radar developed by ThalesRaytheon Systems. It automatically detects, tracks, identifies, classifies and reports airborne threats. It detects helicopters, high-speed attack aircraft and cruise missiles over 360°. IFPC Inc. 2-I will fund the software upgrades to support the current Sentinel’s counter UAS and CM mission.

From: http://www.armyrecognition.com/weapons_ ... 04161.html
One of the most visible features of the IFPC Inc 2-I system is its Multi-Mission Launcher, MML. The launcher, mounted on a medium tactical truck similar in size to a delivery truck, carries 15 modular missile launch tubes on a turret system allowing the missiles to be launched in almost any direction.

Missiles that have been fired from the launcher so far are the AIM-9X, Hellfire, Tamir and MHTK

Deployment is 2019. The MHTK (EAPS) can be quad packed for a total of 60 interceptors per launcher

From: http://defense-update.com/20150328_mml.html
Following the planned demonstration the Army expects to unfold EAPS into the IFPC Inc. 2-I program, meeting the systems’ Block-2 phase fielding credible C-RAM, in addition to Block I Counter Cruise Missile and UAV capability, to be fielded in two active duty and seven National Guard battalions beginning in 2019.
The main advantage of MHTK, besides its low cost, is the larger Load out it offers for each MML. With four MHTK missiles integrated into each tube, the system can hold 15 tubes – or 60 interceptors – a critical capability in combating saturation attacks, with multiple simultaneous engagements, characteristic of RAM threats. It also allows stacking few larger missiles with dozens of miniature interceptors.
User avatar
edsw
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2016 6:05 am
Location: Ukraine

RE: DB ID#2862 YJ-12 SSM

Post by edsw »


Su-34 equipped with electronic warfare station group protection of EPS-14, at a military airfield in Buturlinovka (01/31/2017)
Image
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/2412789.html
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/364168.html
You do not plan to add to the Su-34, a system of electronic interference?
And I saw in the database system of the error, in the first MiG-31 electronic warfare station not Sorbitsiya
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan_MiG-31
http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-407.html
secondly, at the Iskander-M missile complex has a nuclear warhead
warhead is designated 9N70, Power steering 5-50kT.
http://militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-816.html
http://www.milkavkaz.net/2017/01/rf-planiruet-modernizirovat-otrk-iskander.html
In the third, I wrote it here, on the Su-35S optical detection station a missile launch, a similar French Rafale.
Image
Image
trujillocorreo
Posts: 44
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2014 12:19 pm

RE: DB ID#2862 YJ-12 SSM

Post by trujillocorreo »

Hello guys.

Please include Thales PFAS, Planar Flank Array Sonar (TSM 2253 PDVF?) in the submarines of the following classes:

SCORPENE:
-Malasia, Tunku Abdul Rahman. (DB entry # 510)
-Chile, Carrera. (DB entry # 309)
-India, Kalvari. (DB entry # 108)
-Brasil, Riachuelo. (DB entry # 628)

RUBIS:
-France, Rubi (DB entry # 89, # 593, # 457, # 594)

TYPE 209-1300:
-Indonesia, Cakra (DB entry # 583)
-Ecuador, Shyri (DB entry # 578)

http://www.thales7seas.com/flash_2014/index.html
http://www.thales7seas.com/flash_2014/f ... ank_AS.pdf

Thanks!
User avatar
Dysta
Posts: 1909
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 9:32 pm

RE: DB ID#2862 YJ-12 SSM

Post by Dysta »

Could you add 'SS-N-1 Scud-a' in CWDB/DB3000 as well? It's designed for weapon trials to launch from Golf-class submarines, before Sark is in service.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scud 'SS-N-1 Scud A (1955) (R-11FM, KN-11 relative?)'

----

And, there are some missing Armored and Artillery platoons for China in DB3000, all missing in CWDB:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_59_tank
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_63_(tank)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_63 ... l_carrier)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_63 ... rcraft_gun
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_63 ... t_launcher (Type 63 107mm MLRS)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/BM-14#Similar_designs (Type 63 130mm MLRS, Katyusha copy)
...and more.
I1066
Posts: 86
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 3:26 pm

RE: RUSSIAN EW UNITS

Post by I1066 »

Locked

Return to “Mods and Scenarios”