Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations

[HaughtKarl]

Here's my 7900X3D benchmark scores with everything at stock speeds.

CMO bench.jpg (32.83 KiB) Viewed 2516 times

[ioticus]

I don't know what this means, is it bad?

[thewood1]

Broadly speaking, if CMO starts and you can load a scenario, nothing is bad. Most of the benchmarks you see here are for high-end CPUs so comparatively, your 2600 looks weaker. But that's only relative. It really depends on what you are doing with it. Very large scenarios might be slow, but you should be able to play most with no issues.

[ioticus]

Thanks for the info!

[Twistedpretzel]

I forgot about this thread. I'll run a comparison using the legacy 32 bit and new 64 bit next week.

[decaf]

An old Dell XPS 8920 Desktop (state of the art in 2017)
Intel i7-7700K, 4 physical cores, no overclocking

i7-7700K.png (23.83 KiB) Viewed 2070 times

[decaf]

A new Alienware Aurora R16 Desktop
Intel i9-13900F, 24 physical cores, no overclocking, 5.6 GHz max
Note the RAM is rated for 5600 MT/s, matching the CPU

i9-13900F.png (21.53 KiB) Viewed 2067 times

[dmw511]

I slightly downclocked my performance cores to reduce crashes from some poorly optimized Unreal Engine 4 games I've been playing lately, so my slowest pulse times could probably be improved quite a bit if I overclocked this thing:

[thewood1]

I have noticed that 1328.9 has significantly reduced time compression in the benchmarks.

[AdmiralSteve]

Untitled.jpg (171.63 KiB) Viewed 1969 times

[Nemo121]

Seems to have the chops to run the game quickly but the game plays very choppily on even moderately sized scenarios. *Puzzled*

benchmark.png (36.85 KiB) Viewed 1817 times

[thewood1]

Thought I would update my benchmark for the new 1328.10a version. I ran it twice just to compare. There is a little variability inherent in the scenario itself.

Screenshot 2023-10-18 195717.jpg (96.68 KiB) Viewed 1794 times

Screenshot 2023-10-18 200425.jpg (98.44 KiB) Viewed 1794 times

[schweggy]

I'm posting two screen grabs of my rig's results. This one, below is from almost a year ago. Older 32bit build of CMO and my PC only had 8GB of RAM at the time. Pretty miserable results, IMO.

11-22-2022 Benchmark

Benchmark.JPG (34.45 KiB) Viewed 1727 times

This one, below was done today with the latest 64bit build of CMO and an additional 8GB of RAM.

10-29-2023 Benchmark

Benchmark2.JPG (53.26 KiB) Viewed 1727 times

I noticed the minor improvement in performance with the benchmark. Probably due to both the code upgrade to 64bit and the additional RAM. Perhaps some refinements in the base code as well as the move to 64bit. I do have a new PC on order with updated hardware and software so I expect to see further improvements, not only with CMO and other games, but much of the software I currently use as well.

[Nikel]

Nearly a 32% better, it is not minor.

And not a bad performance, you should see mine

[schweggy]

I'm posting two screen grabs of my rig's results. This one, below is from almost a year ago. Older 32bit build of CMO and my PC only had 8GB of RAM at the time. Pretty miserable results, IMO.

Benchmark.JPG

This one, below was done today with the latest 64bit build of CMO and an additional 8GB of RAM.

Benchmark2.JPG

I noticed the minor improvement in performance with the benchmark. Probably due to both the code upgrade to 64bit and the additional RAM. Perhaps some refinements in the base code as well as the move to 64bit. I do have a new PC on order with updated hardware and software so I expect to see further improvements, not only with CMO and other games, but much of the software I currently use as well.

UPDATE:

I purchased a new PC the other day. 14th Gen i7-14700KF 3.4GHz, 32GB RAM, RTX 4070, a single, 1TB boot SSD and a 2TB SSD for storage. A 1TB SATA disk for back ups. Benchmark below...

New Benchmark

Screenshot 2023-11-03 165401.png (139.67 KiB) Viewed 1644 times

[Nikel]

That must be the improvement you were looking for

In the last version, v1.06.1328.11, the devs included:

Code: Select all

* Numerous performance tweaks on map/UI and simulation engine

Will you compare it with your 10a result?

[schweggy]

That must be the improvement you were looking for

In the last version, v1.06.1328.11, the devs included:

Code: Select all

* Numerous performance tweaks on map/UI and simulation engine

Will you compare it with your 10a result?

Yea... I need to do some tweaking with the rig. This benchmark was "off the cuff." I'll try to run another one this weekend.

[TempestII]

i5-13600K
CORSAIR Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5 5200
GTX 1080TI

My desktop benchmarks since March:

20230313 - CMO 64 Bit RDR Benchmark.jpg (45.12 KiB) Viewed 1572 times

20230614 - CMO 1307.18 Benchmark.jpg (47.35 KiB) Viewed 1572 times

20230614 - CMO 1328.3A Benchmark.jpg (46.05 KiB) Viewed 1572 times

20231110 - CMO 1328.11 Benchmark.jpg (46.13 KiB) Viewed 1572 times

Needless to say, there's certainly been an improvement!

[Nikel]

Indeed, discounting the 1315.1 regression, it is 45% faster (lower).

And all the RAM available is now displayed.

[flex0r]

+ GeForce 1050TI

I don't know why it shows only 8gb because I have 16. Maybe that is the reason why the game runs very bad?

Capture1.JPG (33.41 KiB) Viewed 1546 times